StartupNorth

Year: 2010

  • Week in Review

  • The Mark secures Angel financing

    The Mark NewsThe Mark, a community contributed online op-ed magazine, has secured a round of angel financing from David Ceolin, former CEO of Digital Cement; Jordan Banks, former CEO of JumpTV and former managing director of eBay Canada; and Arlene Dickinson, CEO of Venture Communications and co-host of CBC’s The Dragon’s Den.

    This all-star line up of angel investors have provided capital so the Toronto based startup can add hundreds of new contributors, further develop the platform, and build content distribution partnerships. The company was founded by Jeff Anders, who saw the news media landscape in Canada being redrawn and launched the site to provide Canadians with a forum for news, commentary, and debate.

    The Mark is founded on the idea that thousands of credible Canadians have important things to say but cannot reach a national audience. Many want to publish their ideas but have no forum in which to do so. Two million Canadians live abroad and have a deep understanding of the countries and organizations within which they live and work, and yet no publication collects and shares their insights. For these great Canadians, here and abroad, The Mark will be their platform.

    At its core The Mark is a national movement to record Canadian ideas and propel the people behind them. It is a collection of thoughts and a tool for facilitating interdisciplinary dialogue and debate between outstanding Canadians.

    The Mark recruits contributors using two criteria: professional credibility and a connection to Canada. We do not select contributors based on how they vote, where they live, or what language they prefer, and we certainly don’t dictate what they write. The result is a community of thinkers and doers that reflects all points of view on politics, business, science and technology, and the arts. Though we encourage contributors to express their bias, The Mark is not anchored to any one ideology itself. You think, we curate.

    Instead of focusing on facts, The Mark emphasizes analysis. What are the implications of the facts? What trends are emerging? Who are the personalities behind the headlines? What should be done? The Mark’s expert contributors are on the ground making the decisions that ultimately become news; they are in a better position than anyone to answer these questions. The value is in the analysis: it’s not what you know, it’s what you think about what you know.

    The Mark is a library that sheds light on the dusty old question of what it means to be Canadian. It reveals an underplayed side of the Canadian identity: innovative, creative, opinionated and proud to express it, ambitious, and driven to the far corners of the earth to make a difference.

    While obvious comparisons could be made to Now Public or The Huffington Post, since The Mark is focused on reaching Canadians, to size the market opportunity perhaps the closest analogues are sites operated by the likes of The Globe and Mail and The National Post.

    To compete with these established brands The Mark is focusing on amassing a collection of influential individuals to contribute opinion pieces. Compared to major newspapers, The Mark has a far more efficient system for creating and delivering content, having cut out cost centers like labour (35% of revenue) and newsprint (25% of revenue). And so the assault on newspapers continues.

    This financing provides further proof capital is coming back online in 2010. It is shaping up to be an exciting year with plenty of room for commentary on… The Mark.

  • Week in Review

  • New Coworking Space in Toronto – Camaraderie

    Coworking in Toronto

    Rachel and Wayne have done it. Out of the ashes of the Indoor Playground, they have found a space and announced that they are opening Camaraderie. This is fantastic news for Toronto startups, freelancers, independents and others that need shared office space in the downtown core. It’s located at  102 Adelaide St E, 2nd Floor [Maps: Bing, Google]. The space has a free preview from February 15-28, 2010. And then memberships details are as follows:

    • memberships will be $300/mo for unlimited use during business hours
    • we’ll work out keys later, but for now the space will be open 9:00am-6:00pm (or later)
    • free wifi, coffee, tea, and hot chocolate every day

    Pictures

    The Building - 102 Adelaide St E, Toronto, ONBoard RoomKitchen AreaOpen Workspace

    Full details about the space and the neighbourhood.

    Congratulations Rachel and Wayne. We’re looking forward to Toronto rejoining the likes of Montreal and Vancouver with a real coworking space again.

  • Startup compensation in Canada

    Compensation can be a tough thing. It is particularly difficult in startups. How much should you pay founders? How much should you pay early employees? There are legal, tax, financial, retention, and emotional issues tied up in paying your employees. Given that founders/early employees are a critical factor in the success of an emerging company, it is important to understand that attracting and retaining rockstars can help make or break the early success of a startup.

    “As a founder, set your pay to mirror what the company can afford. It is not about what you need, what you want, what is market, what is fair, etc.  It is about the company. 

    Don’t work for nothing, don’t give away your equity and do the right thing for the company are the three pillars that you should based the discussions around.”  – Rick Segal

    Dharmesh argues that founder compensation is usually part of 1 of 2 schools of thought:

    1. Founders get no pay. (“Salaries, we can’t afford no stinkin’ salaries…”)
    2. Founders get paid close to fair market value. (“We raised outside capital so we could reduce our risk, might as well pay ourselves…”)

    He provides a great summary of why it is important to pay founders and early employees. And that there are a number of factors that influence how much these critical employees should be paid. Cash flow and the ability to pay salaries is a critical first step, whether this is through founder loans, early customers, or outside investment. Without money in the bank, it is all deferred compensation. Other critical factors include:

    • available cash,
    • tax optimization (within the law)
    • fair market value (FMV)

    But it still doesn’t answer the question of what should I pay myself, my co-founders or my developers?

    “All of this distracts from the core question of paying value for value. It doesn’t matter what somebody made at their last job.  It doesn’t matter what their expectation is now.  What matters is the value a firm places on the productive capability of an employee.” – Bradford Cross On Wages

    I’ve talked about founders and early employees and their equity stakes in the past. I like the model that Paul Graham provides a model for calculating the amount of equity that can be used for equity grants for key hires (early employees, executives, etc.). The model calculates the value of company with the new employee.

    n = (i – 1)/i where
    n = percentage of the company
    i = average percentage increase in startup value

    The example provided states, that if you add a hacker to the company and you feel they will increase the value of the company by 20%, then you will break even offering them approximately 16.67% of the company. n = 16.7% =  (1.2-1)/1.2. However, this calculation does not include salary and overhead costs. There is some discussion about converting salary and overhead into stock, but the number used is 1.5. The formula uses the Net Present Value of the company, plus the proposed salary, and the expected impact the potential employee will have on value. In the examples provided, Graham uses a recent post money valuation of $2M and a cash compensation of $60,000, and builds in a 50% profit on employee activities in favor of the company. The logic behind the calculation is, if an employee will add 20% value to the company the maximum amount of equity you should provide is 16.67%. However, this number is discounted n = ((1.2-1)/1.2)/(1+0.5)) = 11.13% against the employer generating 50% profit on the efforts of the employee. And is again further discounted against the cash compensation (FMV) and overhead costs (50% of cash compensation), calculated against their equity percentage using the NPV at time of hire, ($60,000*1.5)/$2.000,000 =  4.5%. The total compensation is a mix of cash and equity, i.e., a total compensation of 11.13% of the NPV of the company split into 6.63% equity plus $60,000 in salary.

    • n = percentage equity
    • i = average percentage increase in corporate value of new employee
    • p = profit percentage
    • NPV = Net Present Value of the company
    • FMV = Fair Market Value of employee compensation
    • EOC = Employee Overhead Costs

    n = ((i-1)/(i+p)) - (FMV*(1+EOC)/NPV)

    Yikes, this is getting complicated. The good news is that we can fix some of the parameters.

    • i = 20% (if every employee adds 20% value to the company, you’re should see fantastic growth, adjust this as necessary)
    • p = 50% (assuming you want to make approximately 50% profit on the efforts of every employee)
    • EOC = 50% (approximately 50% overhead on salary costs)

    Hopefully as the early founders, you can figure out NPV but this can be difficult for companies that haven’t closed funding rounds. We’ll assume that this data is available or that the funding round was recently.

    Fair Market Value

    The open parameter is Fair Market Value. How much should you pay a developer? a designer? a senior executive?

    Monster.ca and Salary.com have put together the Salary Wizard. It includes job descriptions and salary ranges based on local geographies. The data is a great starting point for assembling an overview of the fair market value for salaries and cash compensation. Here is a spreadsheet of Toronto Developer salaries (no bonuses). I’ve included job descriptions ranging from entry level programmers to CIOs.

    Plugging in the 5oth percentile salary for a entry-level program into our equation above we get:

    n = ((i-1)/(i+p)) - (FMV*EOC/NPV) = (1.2-1)/(1.2 + 0.5)-((49,830+24,915)/(2,000,000)) = ~8%

    This should not be considered gospel, but it’s a good starting point for figuring out either the rough compensation for early employees including both equity and salary. It also provides a model for helping employees understand why it is so important to take as much of their compensation as equity, i.e., not cash. This provides a starting model for understanding potential compensation discussions. Both Rick & Dharmesh suggest that FMV for early employees may not be the right compensation metric, and that “creating value in ownership” is a much more important number. At HubSpot early employees salaries are 25-50% FMV based on cashflows and the rest is deferred. There are very real taxation issues with deferred comnpensation, and I am not an expert.

    Before you decide on a compensation plan, it’s best to talk to your accountant, your lawyer and your board.  

    Resources

  • Rescheduling Founders & Funders

    Did you know that Feburary 15, 2010 is Family Day?

    It wasn’t something I was thinking about when scheduling Founders & Funders in Toronto. Attendance requests have been very positive. But there has been a theme that we should consider rescheduling to be considerate of those with families (hey that’s me!). I’m working with the venue to find an alternative date for Founders & Funders in Toronto. I’m leaning towards March 1, 2010 as the alternative date. I’d like to get everyone connected before we head out to SxSW, Mix and other conferences and events in March.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    1. I heard you’re not doing Founders & Funders, is that true?
      A: We are still doing Founders & Funders. Details will be announced later this week. The first round of attendees have been selected, and as soon as the venue confirms the new date tickets will be made available.
    2. When is the next Founders & Funders Toronto?
      A: It is To Be Determined but this
    3. How do I attend the next event?
      A:  You need to apply for a spot. Space is limited (approximately 80 available spaces). And we are trying to ensure a great balance between the number of founders, funders and service providers.
    4. How much does it cost?
      Ticket pricing is: Founders – $125; Funders – $250; & Service Providers – $500. Tickets include appetizers, dinner (3 course meal), and wine with dinner.

    I hope to have final details and invitations available by Feb 8, 2010. My apologies for the last minute changes.  

    Cheers,
    David

  • Week in Review

  • Bering Media raises Series A

    BeringHaving learned the ropes as Directors of Sales at Sandvine, cofounders Michael Ho and Nicolas St-Pierre set out to develop technology enabling the delivery of hyperlocal geo-targeted online advertising.

    With a major pilot customer signed on and patent-pending privacy architecture, Bering Media has now secured Series A financing from Tech Capital, GrowthWorks Commercialization Fund, and the Ontario Emerging Technologies Fund.

    Congratulations to the Bering Media team on the raise as well as Tech Capital for successfully bringing in the OETF on this deal, the first co-investment from the $250M fund.

  • Week in Review

  • 10 Things Happening on the Canadian Tech Scene

    I was reading Curbed.com’s Lockhart Steele’s presentation on Ten Things Happening on the New York Tech Scene in ’10 and I thought we shouldn’t be left out. So I started to compile a list of things that I’ve been tracking about the Canadian tech scene leading in to 2010.

    10 Things Happening on NYC Tech Scene in ’10

    View more presentations from lockloct.

    So here’s my list of what’s going on in the Canadian tech startup scene in no particular order (and I know I’ve a few things like cloud with enomaly and vm6). I probably need to do a little more analysis to get this down to a regional analysis, i.e., Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, Waterloo, Calgary, Vancouver.

    What else did I miss?

    10. The Changing Funding environment

    9. Existing Players aka the Big Guys

    8. Open Data

    7. Social Analytics

    6. Social Gaming

    5. Social Media Channels and Advertising Networks

    4. Real-time data and analysis

    3. Mobile

    2. Blogs

    1. Social Places