StartupNorth

Tag: m&a

  • SaaS vs. Traditional Software Licensing Model

    Global software vendors are starting to feel the disruptive effects of the software as a service business model (“SaaS”).  The SaaS model is growing at an annual rate of 15%-20% and will likely represent approximately 25% of the overall software market in the next 5 years. Although this trend is starting to call into question the viability of the traditional software business model, we are quickly reminded that today 95% of software businesses still earn most of their revenues and profits from traditional perpetual licenses and maintenance revenue streams that continue to experience year-over-year single digit growth.

    For the large global vendors, it is difficult to transition from a traditional license to a subscription-based model. If you look at the largest 10 global enterprise software companies including Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, and SAP, less than 2% of their revenues are derived from SaaS.

    Global Software Companies With Large Cash Positions Will Be Looking to Increase SaaS Penetration

    Global Software Companies With Large Cash Positions Will Be Looking to Increase SaaS Penetration

    Here are some of the reasons we believe the transition has been so difficult:

    1. It is hard to move away from the significant upfront fees earned through perpetual licenses to a much smaller recurring monthly fee.  This would decrease immediate earnings and negatively affect the valuations of the large public vendors.
    2. The SaaS business model has not yet proven itself in any meaningful way to be viable given the limited number of software businesses that have achieved scale and profitability.
    3. Most in-house development and implementation teams are not structured to build and deliver multi-tenant solutions through the web. This requires significant investment and time.
    4. Traditional sales teams have not educated their customers to accept monthly recurring fees and are not structured to facilitate a low touch sales approach.
    5. IT departments have been reluctant to share sensitive data through the web for security reasons.

    However, the SaaS business model has some clear advantages that are compelling to its customers:

    1. There are no significant upfront fees.
    2. The client always has the most up-to-date version of the software.
    3. The software is easily configurable and takes less time to implement than on-premises solutions.
    4. Security has been less of a concern with the introduction of secure data sites and private clouds. Software is being audited to ensure it meets compliance guidelines.
    5. Employee workflow is much more efficient, the software is mobile friendly and can be accessed from anywhere.

    There is no question that the SaaS delivery model is more efficient and compelling than an on-premises solution. Having said that, businesses have invested significant time and money in legacy software and in the foreseeable future these businesses will be reluctant to make a change.

    As businesses gradually adapt to the SaaS model, it is taking a while for SaaS companies to reach meaningful scale. Selling licenses at thousands of dollars a month (and in some cases hundreds of dollars a month) and educating customers along the way is a difficult path. We estimate that there are only 50-100 private companies in Canada that have reached critical mass in excess of $5 million a year in recurring revenues.

    We believe that the limited number of SaaS businesses of meaningful scale has created scarcity in the market, driving up valuations. The ten largest global enterprise software companies have in excess of $200 billion in cash and are looking for ways to increase their exposure to the SaaS market.  In June 2013 there were two significant acquisitions: SAP acquired Hybris for $1.3 billion and Salesforce.com acquired ExactTarget for $2.6 billion (8.1x LTM revenues). In 2013, seven companies went public and are currently valued in excess of 6x revenues. Additionally, the group of public SaaS businesses that we track currently trades in a range of 5.0-6.0x 2013 sales.

    Software Companies Have Looked to Grow Through M&A And Will Continue To Do So

    Software Companies Have Looked to Grow Through M&A And Will Continue To Do So

    Although venture capital and private equity’s interest in the enterprise software space is at a historic high, the dollars invested in Q1 2013 is at one of the lowest points in the past 5 years. We believe that three factors are likely driving this decrease in activity:

    1. There are a limited number of SaaS businesses that have reached scale and are supported by experienced management teams.
    2. Most of the venture dollars have been sitting on the sidelines and have been raised by fewer funds that are not readily accessible.
    3. Valuation expectations of entrepreneurs are not in line with those of investors.

     

    Enterprise SaaS Valuations Remain High

    Enterprise SaaS Valuations Remain High

    We are confident that the SaaS business model will continue to gain acceptance throughout the market and that we will see emerging Canadian SaaS businesses gain critical mass. In turn, these businesses will be well funded by both Canadian and US venture capitalists. In addition, there have been over twenty $1 billion strategic SaaS acquisitions since 2011 and we expect this pace to continue or accelerate as the larger enterprise software players seek to participate in this major market transition.

  • 2011: Glass Half-Full or Half-Empty for Canadian VC?

    Editor’s note: This is a cross post from Mark Evans Tech written by Mark Evans of ME Consulting. Follow him on Twitter @markevans or MarkEvansTech.com. This post was originally published in February 14, 2012 on MarkEvansTech.com.

    CC-BY Some rights reserved by waferboard
    Attribution Some rights reserved by waferboard

    First, the good news about Canada’s venture capital landscape. In 2011, investment activity climbed to the highest level in four years ($1.5-billion), a 34% increase from 2010, although it is still significantly below the record activity ($2.1-billion) reached in 2007.

    The bad news is there’s still not enough supply to meet rising demand, plagued by “continued weakness” when it comes to fund-raising.

    The good news-bad news scenario was spelled out in the Canadian Venture Capital Association’s annual report. For those of us in the glass half-full camp, the increase in investment and the number of deal is cause for optimism.

    As well, 2011 saw a spike in M&A activity with 34 deals, including two each by Google, Facebook, Zynga and Salesforce.com. And there was a flurry of incubators and accelerators established, including Extreme Startups last week.

    Before anyone gets carried away, Canada’s venture capital landscape is a long, long way from being solid, let alone robust. There’s still not enough venture capital for seed, series A or major rounds. And don’t expect U.S. investors to pick up the slack.

    In a press release, CVCA president Gregory Smith said there is concern about whether enough fund-raising can be dong to support the demand for investments. This situation was illustrated by the fact new commitments to Canadian VCs were flat last year at $1-billion.

    “Canada has a historic opportunity to become an innovation leader,” Smith said, adding that “in order to act decisively on this opportunity, we must first overcome challenges to supplying VC funds that, in turn, supply entrepreneurs.”

    So what’s the solution? How can Canada’s venture capital community do a better job of supporting the startup community? There is not easy answer to a problem that has been around a long time and doesn’t look to be changing any time soon. It’s not going to be an easy fix from government or U.S. investors or institutional investors waking up to the idea of venture capital investing.

    Perhaps the answer to the problem is this: success. If more startups and mature high-tech companies are acquired, that could (emphasis on “could”) encourage investors (angels, VCs and institutional) to get more involved. Success has a strange way of helping people to see the light or new opportunities that they otherwise would have dismissed or not seriously considered.

    That said, success is a double-edged sword. Without enough financial support, it is hard for startups to have enough powder to become acquisition targets. If they’re not interesting targets, there’s no acquisitions and, likely, less interest from investors.

    So which side of the fence do you sit on? Are you bull or a bear about Canada’s VC landscape?

    Editor’s note: This is a cross post from Mark Evans Tech written by Mark Evans of ME Consulting. Follow him on Twitter @markevans or MarkEvansTech.com. This post was originally published in February 14, 2012 on MarkEvansTech.com.

  • Everyday be hustlin’

    CC-BY-NC-ND Some rights reserved by concheven
    AttributionNoncommercialNo Derivative Works Some rights reserved by concheven

    AdParlorCongratulations to Hussein, Kristaps and their team at adParlor.

    In case you missed it, Toronto-based adParlor has been acquired by AdKnowledge. adParlor is the second Canadian acquisition for AdKnowledge, who acquired Vancouver’s Super Rewards in July of 2009 for a reported $50 Million.

    They managed to build one of “the largest [Facebook] Ads API vendor” and do it here in Toronto.

    “We’ve established an office over here where we now have 11 employees, and we’re all based and comfortable in Toronto. We do have our business development manager in San Francisco way more than he’s here in Toronto.” – Hussein Fazal (LinkedIn, @hussein_fazal) on Mixergy

    Even more impressive is that they built a site, that manages over one billion impressions a day, without raising outside capital. This is freaking impressive. I’m sure there was likely a combination of SR&ED credits, IRAP money, and others. Every entrepreneur should take note: A billion daily impressions without venture funding. Go read or watch Hussein’s interview on Mixergy, he talks about the 2 pivots for the company, the hard decisions, staying in Toronto. He doesn’t talk about all of the successes like the MaRS AlwaysOn trip, the CIX Top 20, but their relentless hustle and drive built a great business with massive traction.

    “no one has hustled harder, stayed humbler, and executed better than him.” – Anonymous VC Comment about Hussein & adParlor

    Thanks for building a fantastic example for Canadian entrepreneurs.

  • The Upside Of Canada’s Startup Buying Binge

    Editor’s note: This is a cross post from StartupCFO written by Mark MacLeod, it is a response to Mark Evans’ post The Downside of Canada’s Startup Buying Binge. Mark MacLeod is a Partner at Real Ventures, Canada’s largest seed VC fund. He is also an advisor to some of Canada’s leading startups including Shopify and others. Follow him on Twitter @startupcfo or StartupCFO.ca. This post was originally published on September 14, 2011 on StartupCFO.ca.

    CC-NC-BY Some rights reserved by Jonathan Gill
    AttributionNoncommercial Some rights reserved by Jonathan Gill

    Mark Evans posted recently about the downside of Canada’s recent startup buying binge. Year-to-date, we have had 22 exits in Canada. But save for outliers like Radian6 and Algorithmics, most have been relatively small. Mark correctly argues that there are long term negative implications to these early exits: losing talent to the US and not building mid to large scale companies that can really bolster our tech scene.

    Can’t argue with that and I have posted in the past about the importance of large tech companies to our ecosystem. But, exits are like pizza, even when they’re bad (small) they’re good. Why?

    Returns to LPs: Returns in the Canadian venture industry since inception are negative. Some funds have delivered returns, but the industry as a whole has not. That won’t work if we want to attract non-government LPs who are motivated by returns vs. policy, job creation. So, any exit that contributes towards fund performance is good.

    Generating repeat entrepreneurs: The reason (I believe) why many of our exits are relatively small is that the founders behind those companies have not had a positive exit before. As an investor, you should not bet against human nature. And I think it’s perfectly natural for an entrepreneur that has the opportunity to sell early and pocket a few million to do that. The trick is to keep that entrepreneur in the system and working on the next company. The next time, that same entrepreneur will set his or her sights much higher.

    Eliminating borders: It used to be an uphill battle to convince US investors to come up here. Now with the elimination of witholding taxes on exit and with our companies doing great things US investors are coming up here more often and earlier in the startup lifecycle.

    So when you think about what’s happening now, my hope is that we are setting the stage for long term success and the creation of some tech giants right here in Canada. To enable that, investors need to do more of the following:

    Give Canadian Startups more capital: This might be ironic coming from a guy at a seed fund, but it’s a well known fact that Canadian startups raise less than their US counterparts. I think it’s fine to operate with small $ before product/ market fit but as soon as you are ready for goto market acceleration you need serious fuel. Canadian investors and entrepreneurs need to continue building strong syndicates that include US investors that can write big cheques.

    We did that at Shopify. The investor group there includes two large tier 1 funds that can help Shopify become a giant in its industry.

    Enable founders to take cash off the table: As a founder you’re more likely to “go for it” if you can sell some shares and not have to worry about cash. This is common practice in the US. We need to do it more up here. It does not make sense early on but series B and up, I think it makes sense.

    Surround our CEOs with mentorship: When you look at the truly giant tech companies, they are almost always founder-led. So that tells me that we have to surround our founders with peers, mentors, coaches, advisors to help them make that transition from founder to CEO.

    We also need tech companies going public here in Canada, but that’s another topic for another time. So, I say bring on these early exits and realize they are setting the stage for great things to come.

    Editor’s note: This is a cross post from StartupCFO written by Mark MacLeod, it is a response to Mark Evans’ post The Downside of Canada’s Startup Buying Binge. Mark MacLeod is a Partner at Real Ventures, Canada’s largest seed VC fund. He is also an advisor to some of Canada’s leading startups including Shopify and others. Follow him on Twitter @startupcfo or StartupCFO.ca. This post was originally published on September 14, 2011 on StartupCFO.ca.

  • The Downside of Canada’s Start-up Buying Binge

    Editor’s note: This is a cross post from Mark Evans Tech written by Mark Evans of ME Consulting. Follow him on Twitter @markevans or MarkEvansTech.com. This post was originally published in September 12, 2011 on MarkEvansTech.com.

    CC-BY-NC Some rights reserved by SteelToad
    AttributionNoncommercial Some rights reserved by SteelToad

    There has been a lot of euphoria and happy dances recently about the flurry of Canadian start-ups being acquired. The list includes Zite (CNN), Five Mobile (Zynga), PostRank (Google), PushLife (Google) and BackType (Twitter).

    The positive news is that the flurry of deals (22 and counting, according to TechVibes) provide a huge boost to Canada’s start-up ecosystem, which needs all the support it can get. Acquisitions reward start-up founders, encourage venture capitalists and angel investors, embolden entrepreneurs, and provide a healthier landscape for people like myself who provide services to start-ups.

    In short, Canada’s start-up ecosystem is on a roll and, hopefully, these deals will make things even better and more active.

    But there is a downside to these start-ups being snapped up. Many of them are early-stage companies with interesting technology but perhaps not a lot of customers or revenue. Rather than a business being acquired, it is the ideas, intellectual capital and, as important, the people that are being purchased. Many acquisitions are fuelled by the need to add strong talent to jump-start the growth of a business or service. Zynga, for example, was looking to boost its mobile development capabilities so buying Five Mobile was a quick way to do it.

    The problems with many of these deals are two-fold:

    1. Many start-ups are snapped up before they get a chance to gain real traction and evolve into small or medium-size businesses that employ dozens or hundreds of employees. It means the loss of an opportunity to build a high-tech community that features a “middle-class” between start-ups and large players (most of them U.S.-owned) such as Microsoft and IBM. In an ideal world, some of these start-ups would grow into an Open Text or, heck, a RIM.
    2. Many of these deals involve some or all of the start-ups’ employees moving out of Canada. PostRank’s employees, for example, moved to the Mountain View, CA. after the Waterloo-based company was acquired by Google. It’s an M&A-driven brain drain when the best and bright entrepreneurs, developers, etc. get sucked south of the border. Granted, many of them will likely return to Canada with more experience and some dollars in their jeans but, in the short-term, it’s a loss for Canada’s high-tech and start-up community.

    I recognize that, in the scheme of things, these are nice “problems” to have. After all, it is better that start-ups are being acquired and investors rewarded as opposed to no M&A activity, which afflicted the start-up landscape for far too long. My point is it is also important to recognize there is a downside, even though it is something we can happily accept.

  • BackType acquired by Twitter

    Backtype has been acquired by Twitter

    Congratulations Christopher Golda (@golda) and Michael Montano (@michaelmontano) on Twitter acquiring BackType. We’ve written about BackType since their acceptance in YCombinator (fortunate that we didn’t give iPartee their previous startup too much attention). This is another amazing acquisition of Canadian startups by a Silicon Valley company (make it 16 acquisitions since Jan 2011 see TechVibes). I think Dan was right, this could be a $1B year for Canadian startup acquisitions.

    The BackType team had already relocated from Toronto to San Francisco. And it looks like the relocation to the Twitter offices should be much easier:

    Our team’s relocating to the Twitter office. We’re very excited to not only join an amazing company that’s changing the world, but to continue building products in pursuit of our shared vision with Twitter.

    Finally, I’d like to thank all our investors and advisors, especially Y Combinator, Toni Schneider and True Ventures, Josh Felser and David Samuel from Freestyle Capital, Manu Kumar, Chris Sacca, Raymond Tonsing and Seth Berman.

    What is amazing/disappointing is that there are no Canadian investors along side the group of amazing investors assembled by Chris and Michael.

  • Cisco looking for Canadian innovation

    We understand that the good people at Cisco are poking around up North for some start-ups to play a role in the company’s expanded focus  into the datacenter, virtualization and smart grid markets.

    These are key new markets for Cisco and clearly they want to know what the most innovative start-ups are up to (isn’t the hunt for innovation why all leading companies come poking around here?)

    Cisco’s got a few criteria (big companies love their processes!) but it should be pretty easy. To summarize: :

    1)      Companies must be active in the datacenter, virtualization or smart grid markets

    2)      Must have existing VC investment

    3)      Ready/able to take their business to the next level

    4)      VC-pitch PowerPoint will be accepted only. (they can’t review websites, datasheets or whitepapers)

    The people doing the poking are Cisco’s Corporate Development team, who are responsible for investment, acquisition, strategy and partnerships for the company. So if any of these options sound appealing to you, forward your slides to Tab Borden of the Canadian Consulate < [email protected]>

  • dna13 acquired by CNW Group

    dna13 acquired by CNW

    This was a crazy weekend for Canadian startup acquisitions.

    First there was Bumptop announced their acquisition by Google. There is StandOutJobs.com being acquired by an unnamed company. Now Ottawa-based dna13 has been acquired by CNW Group. Read the Social Media Release for more details

    “This acquisition reinvents the newswire and we’re terribly excited about it. It’s of benefit to our clients because we’re taking dna13’s technology platform, which is best-in-class, and marrying it with CNW’s suite of offerings. For the first time we’ll be providing an end-to-end solution that will really allow communicators to manage every facet of the communications process. Everything from creating content; targeting your message; distributing your news and information; understanding how that information is being received by your audience to further refining your message and developing metrics. That will all be available to CNW clients in one, single platform.”
    – Carolyn McGill-Davidson, President and CEO, CNW Group

    This makes a lot of sense since CNW Group is a reseller of the dna13 platform under the MediaVantage brand. No details about the purchase price have been disclosed. 

    Looking at the cached Board of Directors page we find:

    We can hope that this was another 10 banger for a Canadian startup.

  • Q&A with RedFlagDeals

    I had the opportunity to ask Derek and Ryan of Clear Sky Media a few questions about the YPG acquisition.

    When did YPG approach you to buy RedFlagDeals.com/Clear Sky Media?

    Derek: We had spoken with YPG over the years about syndicating/sharing data, but things really started to gain momentum in the fall.  Clear Sky Media had traditionally been very focused on national and online offers, but we all recognized the opportunity with local deals and coupons and helping consumers make better buying decisions more broadly. Things moved very swiftly from there and we completed the deal in early February.  YPG is serious about expanding their online presence and they have a scale that will allow us to broaden our reach nationally and at the same time tackle the local space that would have been impossible for us otherwise.

    What is the plan for RedFlagDeals.com and other properties in the YPG portfolio?

    Ryan: As Derek mentioned, the deal makes a lot of sense for both parties.  Local is an area we had always been interested in, but as successful as we had been, we were nowhere near the scale to properly address it.  YPG has over 1000 sales people and direct relationships with about 385,000 businesses in Canada.  Now that we have the scale and the resources, we’re staying on to see how big we can make this.

    It was only four and a half years ago that it was just Derek and I working in a 200sqft office above an Internet café.  It’s very exciting.

    Derek: Beyond local, we’re also looking at what we can do in the shopping search space with PriceCanada.com and we’ll continue to invest heavily and accelerate the growth of RedFlagDeals.com and Scarlett Lounge – more to come!

    What are you going to do next?

    Derek: In the short term there’s a lot of work to do.  We’re keeping our downtown Toronto office and our entire team, but we’ll be expanding rapidly.  Longer term, I think we have an opportunity here to create something that is much greater than the sum of its parts.  No one has really figured out local search and shopping yet.  It’s a challenge, but it’s one that we’re now in a place to take on directly.

    What is one thing would you tell other startups about the acquisition process?

    Derek: Even though this was, in many ways, a very streamlined acquisition, it was very time consuming and sometimes very frustrating.  There is a lot of back and forth on seemingly minor items, but it’s a necessary part of the process. Having lawyers and accountants that you trust who have worked through it before is huge.

    What is one thing you would do differently?

    Derek: Because of the timeline we were working on, it might not have been possible in our specific case, but before the Letter Of Intent was signed, I would have had a more detailed discussion about what exactly the due diligence required and what we would need to do to close.  In our case, we had a short period for all of this and in hindsight, I would have given ourselves more time.

    Ryan: The timeline also meant that the initial transition has been a bit bumpy.  If we had had more time, I would have liked to have had our accounting, HR, and PR processes in line.  All things considered, it’s gone well, but we could have saved ourselves time and headaches with a better fleshed out transition plan.

    Final thoughts?

    Ryan: We’re really proud to have been involved in the Canadian startup scene over the past 5 years.  It’s not always easy being a Canadian startup; really, it’s a pain in the ass a lot of the time, but you can be successful in Canada.  In the areas where Canada is behind the US, there are opportunities.  Plus, you have one of the most supportive communities I’ve seen anywhere rooting for you.  It’s been awesome.  Thanks everyone!