• Back to Reality – Vancouver Enterprise Forum

    index_r1_c3.jpgWhile the rest of us are sitting around moaning about the state of canadian venture capital, it appears that Vancouver is so over it, the Vancouver Enterprise Forum is at least.

    This Tuesday, November 27th, they are hosting “Beyond B.C. VCs – tips for Sourcing Tech Funding from American Venture Capitalists”

    In the November VEF event, we?ll hear from experienced American venture capitalists as they explain the fundamentals they look for when investing in B.C. and Canadian companies. How do you approach American VCs? What kind of information and potential do they want to see? What approach is best? These questions and more will be answered by Geoff Entress from Madrona of Seattle, which made an investment in Victoria based PixPo in 2006, and by Alex Gove of Walden Venture Capital of San Francisco.

    This is not a small matter for Vancouver, which has seen its share of startups heading south for funding.

    The catch? How long will startups stick around beautiful Vancouver, or anywhere in Canada, when their Venture Capitalist investors are beckoning them to come south. It starts with “let’s move the sales office”, and soon enough everyone but the developers are gone.

    This is a subject that we will be diving in to more here. Would you rather take funding outside of Canada, or would you consider it a secondary option? Considering how tightly connected Canada and the US are, does it even matter? Do we need to be doing more to make it easier for american funds to invest here?

  • Razzle Clones Woot

    Update: Caveat Emptor
    Razzle made a serious misstep selling refurbished headphones as new. The first batch of customers felt burned and started discussing their experiences on Red Flag Deals. Razzle made another poor choice by posting a fake testimonial on Red Flag Deals (under the name lohervine); a site administrator outed them by comparing IP addresses. Razzle is offering refunds, but has not yet committed to covering shipping.

    Woot sells refurbished items all the time, but they clearly state the item’s condition. While I doubt Razzle was set up to scam users, they really fumbled the ball losing the trust of their very first customers.

    On the lighter side and as predicted, a customer ended up at Razzle.com by mistake.

    Original Post
    Razzle LogoRazzle.ca, Canada’s first deal a day site, launched today. The first deal: wireless headphones for $51.90. Too rich for your blood? Well join the site anyways, because they plan to giveaway a few items every so often.

    The Montreal based site was founded by Ryan Closs, 26, who faithfully cloned Woot. Emulating a successful concept is a legitimate business strategy, so I am not going to criticize Ryan for that.

    Think Bill Gates came up with the Windows GUI? Heck even Wal-Mart’s Greeter was an idea Sam Walton copied from K-Mart. And let’s not forget to mention the multi-million dollar exits Facebook clones are making (Germany, China). That said, I would have probably paraphrased Woot’s FAQ a little less closely.

    Today’s launch had some to be expected hiccups. Fortunately, the admins were on the ball and put out the small fires in the comments. A longer term issue might be the Razzle.ca domain name. It is pretty catchy, but direct navigation traffic will occasionally end up at Razzle.com by mistake. Those users are in for a surprise… not safe for work! There is a lesson here for other entrepreneurs, pay attention to abutting domain names!

    Congrats on the launch!

    Contact: Ryan Closs

  • Angel financing – What angels look for in a company: Management (part 4 of 6)

    Now that you have given investors an overview of your product, market potential, and competition, they should have a good idea of what your company is all about and what its potential is. The next, and arguably most important topic, to cover is your company’s management. So why is management so important? Its because since early stage companies are risky and have a high chance of failing, investors look to the company’s management to ensure they have the experience, skillset, and connections to give the company the best chance of succeeding. A strong management team would include aspects such as:

    1. The CEO has a history of successfully starting and and selling companies – i.e. there is a past track record to give confidence that he/she can do it again
    2. The management team has worked together on past ventures – i.e. there is a past track record that the team works well together and there are no team dynamics issues
    3. The management team has deep experience in the industry – i.e. they have the credibility and relationships in the target industry to help get traction for the company?s product/service

    Now there are lots of examples of first time CEOs that have established very successful companies. So don’t take the above that I am suggesting its not possible. What I’m saying is that for outside investors that don’t know you or your company, having a past track record of successfully doing a similar activity provides more comfort. You would probably approach things the same way if you were looking to hire a key employee for your company – you would want to find somebody that has strong past work experience in doing a similar job.

    Since many early stage companies will not have a fully rounded management team, here are some strategies to handle this:

    Missing positions
    When a company first starts out, most likely the founders are wearing multiple hats in the roles they play. As the company grows, it is natural to bring on more members of the management team to add more specialized experience (i.e. a dedicated CFO, sales director, etc). Investors will understand this, so when you talk about your management team you should highlight the positions you feel it is missing and ones you would look to hire. This will demonstrate you can accurately assess your team and understand how it will need to change as the company grows. As some angel investors are looking to get involved with a company, they may be interested in joining the team to help the company or know of somebody else who would be interested. You should also be prepared to discuss what you see as your role in the company going forward and if you see yourself as always being the CEO. There may come a time when as a founder of the company you need to bring on another person as CEO that can take the company to the next level. I will talk more on this topic in a future article on founders syndrome.

    Board / advisors
    Another way to enhance the experience / credibility of a company’s management team is to build up a strong board of directors or advisory board. You would want to identify people that can provide value to the company in either the experience they have (i.e. if this is your first time as CEO you would want to find somebody that is an established CEO) or in the contacts they have (i.e. find somebody that is well respected/connected in the industry your company is targeting). By having these types of people involved with your company, you will be able to consult with them to discuss issues/problems your company is facing and tap into their networks to help open doors for sales, partnerships, alliances, etc. Another benefit is that it will help out the due diligence process with investors.

    Usually the first thing a group of angels will do in evaluating a company is to reach out to their network to find somebody in the industry or who knows of somebody on the company’s management team to get their insights on what they think of the company. If you have well respected people on your board or advisory board that believe enough in your company to put their name behind it and spend their time to help out, it will go a long way in establishing outside verification that your company is onto something.

    In my next article, I will talk about the financial aspects of your company to cover in an investment presentation. As always, if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions for future articles feel free to contact me: craig at mapleleafangels.com

  • Startup M&A – Raincity Studios acquires Bryght

    filesrc.png
    logobryght.png

    Bryght, a Drupal managed hosting startup based in Vancouver, BC has been acquired by long time partner RainCity Studios, who have developed sites such as Ozzy.com and Ask a Ninja.

    While the terms of the deal weren’t disclosed, and I am not sure the number would be huge, this feels primarily like a smart consolidation of two very complimentary businesses. Servicing the same niche doesn’t necessarily mean two businesses should merge, but in this case the two organizations have been working together on so many projects, for so long, I have a feeling that this will be a chance to consolidate their efforts and cut some of the fat by re-directing effort.

    Many of the Bryght and RainCity Studios employees and partners are also responsible for the Northern Voice conference, which has been a huge hit for years.

    The new company is underway opening a new office in Shanghai, China, and my bet is that the renewed energy from this merger will result in a lot of cool projects in the near future. Kris Krug will be the President of the new organization with Robert Scales as CEO and running the European and Asian side of the company.

    I should also disclose: I have been a happy client of both of these companies in the past.

    Update: More straight from the source here.
    (more…)

  • mesheast.com – East Coast Startup Blog

    picture-2.pngMeshEast is the latest entrant on to the Canadian Startup blog scene. I was excited to get an email from Lisa Rousseau, who is also working on her own startup, to see that the east coast would finally have a local startup blog. Lisa is going to have some work to do in finding and profiling those elusive east-coast startups, but my guess is that she will find more than enough to get started in her home province of New Brunswick.

    So please, head over to MeshEast and subscribe. We have been covering some of the bigger happenings on the east coast, but there are always a lot of things we just can’t cover. We are working on our own profile of what is going on in Atlantic Canada, and so far I have been excited about what I have seen.

    We have been trying to do as much as we can to encourage local blogs that will cover smaller regions in more detail. Montreal is the luckiest with MontrealTechWatch, which is run by Heri (who might be the hardest working blogger in Canada these days), and Ottawa has StartupOttawa, which is really starting to pick up steam. There are some gaps to fill, so if you are passionate about startups then it is time to get off your butt and step up to the place. I can think of dozens of local blogs I would love to see: Waterloo, Calgary, Vancouver, Victoria, and the Prairies all come to mind as the biggest gaps out there.

    So get started, and get in touch. We want to help!

  • groovle.com – Customized Google Search Pages

    picture-2-21-01-42.pngYou may have heard before: Google pays big money to people who send searchers their way. In the case of Mozilla, the search bar in the top right-hand corner of their webbrowser makes them something on the order of $40million a year. That’s a lot of money for searches. I don’t even want to know how much Apple makes off the Google search they have embedded in Safari.

    Goovle, a Oakville, Ontario startup, is trying to take advantage of Google’s generous kickbacks with their custom search tool.

    Groovle allows you to create a customized search page of your own, which most users would typically set as their homepage. Groovle’s unique feature is the huge library of images you can access to create your own page. You can also upload your own images.

    trans.pngThe comments on their September review on Techcrunch predicted that Groovle would be shut down quickly. It is now the middle of November and they are still around. While I share some of the concerns of those commentors – it is not clear whether groovle actually has any rights to use these images – that doesn’t seem to be stopping them.

    As of October 2007 they were clocking 250,000 visitors a month, but it is unclear how they have been doing since (compete.com is suggesting a 70%+ drop in traffic but I don’t trust compete all that much).

    Groovle is a great example of a simple service with a potentially large audience that just takes a little elbow grease. All the components are there, Google is providing search and a kickback to sites who send searches their way, and there is (apparently) a wealth of art and images out there that you can make available to users.

    Groovle is self funded by its founders, Ryan Fitzgibbon, Jacob Fuller and Nico Angka, and they are not currently seeking investment, but are perusing partnerships.

    Contact Jacob Fuller
    (more…)

  • Coast to Coast: Amateur Sports Teams 2.0

    One of the first startups we profiled on StartupNorth was New Brunswick based Yourteamonline. Since then Yourteamonline has launched version 2.0 of their sports team management suite and added a slew of new features. In the meanwhile, Victoria based TeamPages has also risen in prominence.

    Both TeamPages and YourTeamOnline provide player pages, statistics, team pages and league interaction. It seems like we have a coast to coast fight for the amateur sports team demographic.

    clash.gif

    The market for amateur sports related spending in North America alone is $111 billion. More than enough room for two leaders, and even better if they are both from Canada. The amount of targeted advertising dollars up for grabs is staggering. Add on the amount of money that changes hands for local team sponsorships every year, and things are looking up!

    The first similarity I noticed was the abundant use of blue on both companies’ websites. The choice of colors is not where the similarities end however. And this is where I start to wonder a little.

    Both YourTeamOnline and TeamPages are marketing themselves as a generalized sports team management toolkit. If I were calling the shots here (which I am not!), I would approach each sport differently. YourTeamOnline is starting down this path, they have customized versions for Hockey and Soccer, but their marketing is still focused at a general market, which is going to be tougher to capture. This is the same strategy that every other competitor in the marketplace is using and it is going to be tough to stand out, even with a much better than average offering.

    YourTeamOnline and Teampages both focus on letting individuals, teams and leagues build social networks, and each have unique characteristics that, in my opinion, make them the two best team/league platforms out there. Where most competitive packages focus on the minutiae of managing a team, YourTeamOnline and TeamPages focus on the individual users, whether they are coaches, parents or players.

    I am also impressed with the roadmaps that both companies allude to on their sites. YourTeamOnline has plans to launch youtube-like video uploading and a feature called “SportsWire” that helps get team statistics out to the public, newspapers, and other consumers of team data.

    Is this a clash of the titans? A fight to the death? Jackie Chan vs. Chow Yun Fat? I think it is probably more the result of an overdue idea and a huge market, with scalable revenue opportunities. Will there be one winner, or two? We’ll be watching to find out.

    YourTeamOnline and Teampages have each taken early-stage funding.

  • New Brunswick Startup Competition Finalists (Breakthru)

    breakthru.gifThe finalists have been announced for the New Brunswick startup competition we covered a few months ago.

    I have to say, without having seen the actual products, that this list of startups really surprised me. Things are happening in New Brunswick! The mix is as creative, smart, useful and even as frivolous as any mixup of startups I have seen in other regions. Congrats to NBIF for running this contest and getting these startups some exposure.

    I am looking forward to seeing how this shakes out and who comes out the winner. Read on for the full list of finalists.
    (more…)

  • Angel financing – What angels look for in a company: Competitors and barriers to entry (part 3 of 6)

    So now that you have generated interest in what your product does and its market potential, the next question from investors will be who are your competitors and what are the barriers to entry? This area of your business will be the most dynamic, especially if you have yet to launch your product or service. You will not be able to predict all possible new companies that may enter your space or how existing companies will react. As such, investors are both trying to understand how your company stacks up against competitors as well as gauge your ability to assess and position your company against competitors. This will determine the comfort level they will have that you will be able to properly identify and react to competitive threats that may arise in the future.

    In our iPod case example, as it’s a pretty mature market, you would want to list off the main companies that produce cases, outline their respective market share, and discuss what your company’s advantages/disadvantages are against each competitor. When you outline the market share of each competitor, you should compare this to your financial projections on what market share your company is targeting. Investors will be using this as a benchmark to assess how realistic your financial projections are. For example, if you are in a fragmented market with many established competitors, none of which have more than 10% share, and your financial projections assume you gaining 25% share, investors will want to know why you think your company can achieve this when all your competitors could not.

    Even if you are fortunate enough to have a product or service that is truly ground breaking and no other company produces anything similar, do not say that you have no competitors. Although you may have no direct competitors, your target customers probably have a variety of choices for other products or services that address their problem. For example, the Segway personal transporter may have no direct competitors. However, the target customers for Segways have many choices as to how they solve their transportation requirements: they can take public transport, use a bicycle, use a car. You would want to assess the companies that provide alternate solutions and provide commentary on your product’s advantages/disadvantages. You will also want to provide commentary how will these companies will react if your company starts to take away their customers. Will they look to stem the outflow by reducing cost of their product, attempt to lock in their customers, or will they try to develop a similar product to the one your company offers? You should also discuss other companies in un-related industries that may have expertise in some aspect that is important to produce your product. In the Segway example, a potential competitor may come from an aerospace company that has expertise in gyroscopes needed to implement the balancing mechanism. If they see your product taking off, will they want to build off this expertise and try enter your industry with a competing product?

    In order to fend off companies trying to produce a similar product to the one your company offers, you need to realistically assess what is the unique expertise that your company possesses that gives it the ability to produce your product. Do you have key employees with the technical knowledge, do you have key suppliers or partners that develop parts of your product, do you have intellectual property that the company has developed. Based on this, you will want to erect barriers to entry to make it harder for a competitor to come in and duplicate your product. This can take the form of employment contracts, patents, trademarks, or exclusivity arrangements with suppliers. This will make it easier for your company to focus on growing market share rather than fending off competitors trying to offer a directly similar product at a lower price point.

    One tip, although money is stretched thin in a start up and often the focus will be on funding the development of the product, it would be wise to get legal counsel early on in terms of the intellectual property protection strategy your company will take. Understanding what is patentable can be a complicated area and is something you will want a seasoned legal professional to give you advice on. This is important because when you start to engage other people (investors, partners, suppliers) in discussions about your company and what it does, you need to be careful what you disclose. If you provide information into the public domain that you may want to patent in the future, you will not be able to claim a patent anymore. Having a strong patent strategy can significantly increase the attractiveness of the company to investors, provide justification for a higher valuation, and give potential competitors a reason to buy your company rather than try to work around your patents.

    In my next article I will speak about the area that is probably the most important in terms of what investors look for in a company – its management team. As always, if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions for future articles feel free to contact me: craig at mapleleafangels.com

  • Defensio – Anti-Spam Startup

    picture-1-9.pngOk, this takes guts: entering a market with a niche product where the incumbent is not only a darling of the industry, but owns the primary platform on which you are going to have to compete for users. Akismet really changed everything for bloggers. We used to spend hours a week deleting comment spam, but Akismet made that all go away.

    Enter Defensio.

    Defensio is coming after the same market as Akismet (going as far as to provide only a WordPress plugin so far). We are late to the game in profiling them, and while the reviews have all been really positive so far, most end with the idea that the author will probably just stick with Akismet.

    It would be really easy to write off Defensio at this point. This is the part where the VC tells Carl, Mathieu and the other guys at Defensio that they aren’t differentiated, that the market is too small and that the incumbent has way too much penetration, especially with early adopters. (don’t let the door hit you on the way out)

    I see it differently. The second mover has a serious chance to make it big here. Defensio’s current strategy is to charge high-volume bloggers and commercial bloggers a small fee for using Defensio’s anti-spam technology. This is potentially lucrative on its own. If Defensio can provide a higher level of integration support and a better protection product, then they will be able to win some customers over from Akismet, but it is absolutely going to be a hard-fought battle, with everyone trying to row the boat a little harder in order to win.

    The real opportunity for Defensio however is to raid the markets that Akismet has left untouched. Where Akismet has proven the technology, and opened an initial market which Defensio can sell to, they are also leaving peripheral markets completely alone.

    dartboard.pngIf you believe, like I do, that user generated content is, and will be even more of, a big deal, then you have to accept that SPAM is going to be an even bigger problem down the road. Where Norton and McAfee made millions selling anti-spam products for your Outlook client, Defensio has an opportunity to become the enterprise-strength anti-spam solution for user-generated content.

    Review websites, corporate homepages, public wikis, all deal with serious spam problems. Considering the anti-spam market, which is speculated to be in the $2billion or higher range, still hasn’t started providing the sort of lightweight but bulletproof solutions that bloggers have grown accustomed to means that there is probably an entirely new market sitting there waiting for someone to come to the rescue.

    To do this, Defensio will have to work hard on building some early partnerships, which is admittently a tough job. I am looking forward to checking in with Defensio in 6 months to see how things are going.

    Contact Carl Mercier