• Reminder: Office Holiday Party

    There are a few geekmas parties going on this December, and they are selling out quickly. Both have been organized by members of the community, and look like they will be a blast.

    Montreal has CelebrateCamp on December 18th.

    Come out an celebrate 2008 with the Montreal Technology Community. We have many things to celebrate as a community. A successfull year of Barcamps, StartupCamps, Democamps, Podcamps and a number of other community events flourished this year. We’ve seen more startups launched, more investing activity and a number of our local friends have personal & professional success created in 2008.

    and in Toronto there is #hohoto, which came together on Twitter in a matter of days. It is taking place at The Mod Club – Monday, December 15, 2008, 7pm. There will be DJs, cheap drinks and all the proceeds are going towards the Daily Bread food bank.

    Update:

    Halifax is having a Geekmas event on December 17th raising money for Feed Nova Scotia!

    Which other cities will get on board and start raising money for charity?

  • Pitch coaching – Reasonably Smart

    Thanks to everybody who has submitted a pitch in response to my post on pitch coaching. As I mentioned in the post, I’ll post some of the pitches & my feedback to help people refine their pitches. I’ll focus my commentary on 3 main questions:

    1) Have you clearly outlined the problem & how your product/service addresses it?
    2) Have you covered the main areas investors are interested in?
    3) Have you generated a sense of interest that your company has real potential that people will want to take the time to learn more in a more in depth meeting?

    As I’m not familiar with every company’s domain, I’ll more focus on the structure of the pitch and leave the fact checking of the content to the wisdom of the crowd.

    The first pitch I’ll discuss is from a company called Reasonably Smart. Their pitch is located here.

    My feedback I gave is as follows.

    Have you clearly outlined the problem & how your product/service addresses it?

    To level set, I have a corporate IT background so can understand the points you are making on slides 2 & 3. However, if you are pitching to a general angel group, you would probably loose 90% of the people on the first 2 slides as they would not have technology backgrounds. To make your pitch more accessible, I would re-cast these 2 slides to discuss the business problem from your end customer’s standpoint. i.e:

    For app developers – cost advantages of micro-unit hosting vs per server or per slice hosting options
    For hosting providers – cost advantages to higher utilization of their server inventory capacity
    From a functionality standpoint, advantages of a richer set of technical services in your platform and what this means in terms of speed to develop, quality, operations, etc. and ultimately how this lowers cost.

    All angels will have seen many deals involving a start-up developing and selling a software app. So if you can frame your company in terms like by using this platform a company can develop an app quicker (save on product development), get to market quicker (faster revenue ramp), and pay less in operational cost (accelerate time to profitability) – this is something they will be able to relate to.

    Have you covered the main areas investors are interested in (market potential, revenue model, competition, management, go to market strategy, exit, deal terms)?

    You have covered off some of the points but questions I would have would be:

    The slide on competition is very complicated – I would simplify to a few key direct competitors and position them on how they stack up relative to your company.

    How large is this market, how much revenue do you feel your company can make? Since this is a new market, if your competitors are more mature, show their revenue which can help validate this market space and give relative benchmarks against your revenue targets.

    Who are your target customers. The list you provide on page 6 is quite large and would require very different sales approaches for a start-up vs. an enterprise company. What are you going to focus on and how will you do it?

    What are the terms of the deal & how will investors realize an exit?

    Have you generated a sense of interest that your company has real potential that people will want to take the time to learn more in a more in depth meeting?

    This is a tough one to call for me. If I put my technical hat on: On one hand it sounds interesting due to the benefits in developing and operating apps but on the other hand I’m not that familiar with the PaaS space so can’t really judge if your offering is something that is already offered by other direct competitors.

    If I put my business hat on: My comment would be that you have talked about a bunch of technology but have not provided any insight to ROI of customers to use this technology. So its hard to gauge the demand in the market for your offering or get a feel of what your company’s revenue potential is.

    This is my take on the pitch. Feel free to post comments with other insights / alternate viewpoints as there is never one right way to craft a pitch.

    If anybody else has pitches they would like feedback on, send to me at craig (at) mapleleafangels.com

  • Xtreme Labs iPhone Speedtest makes Top Ten

    Xtreme Labs SpeedtestToronto based Xtreme Labs, the development arm of Extreme Venture Partners, has a hit on their hands. Their iPhone App ‘Speedtest’ has been deemed a top ten app in the free utilities category by Apple. Speedtest is offered as free ad supported app and also as a paid app with no ads. Speedtest is now also available for Blackberries and Androids.

    Word is that the devs at Xtreme Labs have a little competition going with some of ExtremeVP’s portfolio companies to see who can get the widest distribution fastest. Sounds like fun!

  • Montreal Start Up raises another $2M

    Montreal Start Up announced today the closing of an additional $2,000,000 for its venture fund from the Solidarity Fund QFL, bringing total assets under management to $5,000,000. The Solidarity Fund QFL joins Investissement Québec, la Conférence Régional des Élus, and 20 of Montreal’s most successful entrepreneurs and investors who partnered with Montreal Start Up to address the need for more early stage capital and mentoring.

    “We have met with hundreds of entrepreneurs since our launch and the quality and creativity of the ideas we are seeing is constantly improving. We were having to turn down good deals because of the limited amounts of capital available to us. The support of Solidarity Fund QFL will allow us to support more of Montreal’s best startup companies.” John Stokes, Montreal Start Up

    Also revealed were Montreal Start Up’s four latest investments: Mobilize Central, KeenKong, The Book Oven, and Oneeko all of which are based in Montreal. These investments are in addition to its previously announced investments in Standout Jobs and Akoha.

    This is all fantastic news from Montreal, easily one of the most vibrant startup communities in Canada.

  • VeloCity Project Exhibition

    Joey offers his summary of the University of Waterloo VeloCity Fall 2008 Project Exhibition.

    DSC_0105

    Velocity is a student residence, it is a dorm for 70 University of Waterloo students that encourages students to form teams and build projects to be showcased at the end of term Project Exhibition. This was the first group of students in the dorm and there were 16 student projects created. Each team of students provided a 3 minute pitch to the audience in the lobby of the Davis Centre. Amar Varma from Extreme Ventures had a Cdn$1000 prize for the “project team deemed worthy”.

    Sparknav was the winner of the $1000 from Extreme Ventures.

    1. Grocerus – A location-aware web app that matches grocery lists against hand entered grocery store data. Built in PHP.
    2. Gruup – A group buying service.  Built on Pligg in PHP.
    3. Sparknav – A mobile navigation application for use in enclosed (non-GPS) spaces. Prototype build for Android.
    4. Emoshion – A mobile application for location-based fashion news.
    5. Find It Off Campus – A web application for helping UW students use geography and location to find housing. Built in Rails.
    6. Szello Mobile – A mobile consultancy focusing on mobile user experience and UI design.
    7. Fading Hearts/Magical Aces – An anime styled choose your own adventure.
    8. Ufansi – A web application that helps connect donors with charities. Built on Drupal in PHP.
    9. Giftah – A web application that creates a marketplace for gift card exchange.
    10. ClassAlbum – A web application for managing classroom schedules and finding vacant rooms.
    11. Comic Battle – A multiplayer online fighting game built in Flash.
    12. My Story – A publish platform for authors.
    13. CashIn – A wallet with an electronic financial advisor that tracks your spending and provides warnings based on personal budgeting.
    14. inPulse – “Send email to my watch”. A Bluetooth watch that connects to your mobile device to display email, SMS, caller ID on your watch.
    15. Threadband – A causal game for the iPhone.
    16. Metacast – A YouTube or Blip.TV competitor. Allows users to create channels of existing RSS feeds. Built in PHP.

    The projects ranged from a series of ideas expressed on posters; to functioning software. As Rick Segal and Austin Hill conveyed at StartupEmpire, it is great to see entrepreneurs get up in front of an audience and give their pitch. One of the main reasons that entrepreneurs in other locations (particularly Silicon Valley) are better at giving pitches is the number of times they give the pitch and the amount of feedback they receive.

    Generally, the projects and the presentations were uninspiring. This is not to say that the entrepreneurs should be discouraged. But that I was underwhelmed by both the content and the presentation style. It leads me to one of the key takeaways from StartupEmpire. It is that we need to build a better formalized mentoring network for young entrepreneurs. When I look at programs like Techstars in Boulder, CO they are built on the notion of mentorship. Just look at their Mentors (there are 59 listed on the dang page): Brad Feld, David Cohen, Howard Lindzon, Jeff Clavier, Stewart Alsop. The mentors are from all over the US and cover a wide range of expertises in different industries and functions. If an entrepreneur can’t find a mentor that can listen to their situation and coach them on how they could perform, then the entrepreneurs shouldn’t be in the TechStars program. To this end, Jesse Rogers called me out on providing mentorship to the VeloCity students. I will be following up with Sean Van Koughnett to offer my time to mentor any of the teams or students.

    For the hell of it

    “If you build it, they [sic] will come.” – Shoeless Joe Jackson in Field of Dreams 

    My first piece of advice for any of the VeloCity student is be realistic about what you are building. So many entrepreneurs appear to take the “Field of Dreams” approach to project selection. There is nothing wrong with this approach, however, just because you’ve built software that solves your problem doesn’t mean that there are customers, a potential market or any reason to raise funding. A programming exercise does not by default equal a multi-million dollar company. There are a great number of projects and tools that were developed as to solve problems for a developer (look at rake, ant and Capistrano) that are not businesses. They enable developers to be more productive but are not great businesses.

    Glimmers of hope

    Some of the projects like Sparknav, Emoshion, Find It Off Campus showed the first steps to becoming real businesses. They demonstrated the ability of the team to deliver functioning, stable code. They demonstrated a need in the community – Find It Off Campus already has 108 rental properties after less than 2 weeks of being live. And Emoshion, while too narrowly focused as pitched by the founders to be a great business, it demonstrates a potential white-labelable mobile social networking application that I’ve seen requested by ad agencies and marketers. These startups could benefit from time with experienced technologists, business development persons, investors, and marketers about how and when to monetize and grow their offering.

    It was great to see 16 short presentations from the residents of VeloCity. It will be interesting to see if the quality of the projects and outcomes increases at the end of the Winter 2009 term.

  • StartupEmpire – Pitch coaching

    Last week I was at the StartupEmpire conference. Thanks to Jevon, David, Rick and everybody else who helped in putting the conference together. It was a great demonstration of how the local tech community can come together to help entrepreneurs.

    One session of particular interest was the ‘insta-pitch’ session. In this, 5 companies came up on stage to give a 2-4 minute pitch. They then received candid feedback from a panel of VCs on what was good / not good about their pitches. First off, kudos to the companies that took this opportunity to do their pitch and be willing to receive the panel’s feedback in a public forum. However, as was mentioned by the panel, the pitches all needed work. Being able to successfully secure funding is an important factor in the success of a startup and this all starts off with being able to pitch well.

    So, in the spirit of interactivity, lets try something out. E-mail me your pitches in the form of a powerpoint presentation. I’ll select and post some of the good ones to show examples of good pitches. For the non-so-good ones, I’ll give some suggestions for improvement and post the before / after.

    A few guidelines:

    Keep it to 6 slides of content.

    If you are in stealth mode, feel free to doctor the name of the company / facts but just let me know this is not real.

    Craft the pitch as an initial pitch (i.e. one you would give to an angel group selection committee or use to get a meeting with a VC). Your goal is to give a brief overview of all important aspects of your company & build interest and excitement that people will want to spend the time to learn more about the opportunity in a more detailed follow on meeting.

    The standard no-harm rule applies.

    craig (at) mapleleafangels.com

  • Wish you were there… StartupEmpire Roundups

    StartupEmpireStartupEmpire rocked! Here are some roundups in case you couldn’t make it: Flow Ventures takeaways, BlogTO learned why now is a great time to start a tech company, Joey Devilla has excellent summaries of Don Dodge, Hugh MacLeod, David Cohen, Rick Segal, and Howard Lindzon’s keynotes. Listen to Ken Seto’s recordings of StartupEmpire keynote presentations. And here is Don Dodge’s pre-conference interview on CBC Radio.

  • MaRS Phase II in the Deadpool

    The MaRS Center is seeing the second phase of development go on hold.

    Phase II, which involved the development of a second tower on the west side of the property, has been cancelled, despite having been ahead of schedule so far. The reason given by Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc, the American developer behind the project, is that they just couldn’t secure enough leases to make the project move forward.

    I first heard about this a few days ago when an unsubstantiated rumor was posted on Urban Toronto (a great forum that I lurk in). Then when I was up in the area yesterday I noticed that the site was pretty quiet, but still wasn’t sure. That was until I looked at the National Post this morning and it was right there on the front page.

    The MaRS center is a confusing thing for tech entrepreneurs. There are a few startups in there, and it is home to a Celtic House office and RBC Ventures. They also have some really fantastic people working there, such as Peter Evans and Allen Gelberg, who have reached out to the startup community in a big way and who have provided a venue for things like Mesh and the Facbook Developer Garage.

    My sense is that MaRS has a much bigger impact on the medical research and commercialization community, but I am not connected to that community and have no way of knowing.

    MaRS was never a center for the tech community however. Simple economics make it impossible for such a high-cost building to truly have an impact at a community level. There are three old garment factories at Spadian and Queen that have had more of an impact. This isn’t a new phenomenon either, when I was building some of my first startups in Charlottetown, the provincial and federal government spent almost $35million building something called the Atlantic Technology Center.

    In terms of the size of the city and community, the Atlantic Technology Center was even more ambitious than MaRS, and it was even more disconnected from the community. While some of the best startups were moving in to great historic office spaces, government contractors and service firms piled in to the Tech Center. It was high-cost, anti-septic and too ambitious.

    The truth is, if you want to transform the tech community in a place like Toronto or any other city, you don’t need $20million, or $200million. For all the dreams of trying to turn some city in to the “next valley”, the point gets missed every time. You could put Toronto, Montreal, Halifax, Calgary or Vancouver on the world map with almost no money. Put a couple million together and find the right people to deploy it. We need to start loving our cities and the communities that are coming to life in them.

    The problem is that government officials can ascribe value to real estate. We all love to build big things that people can see, touch and talk about. Until those same people can understand the value of a vibrant and productive community, then we will never get the participation that we truly need.

    It is worth pointing out that MaRS has billed itself as a home for academic research and eventual commercialization, not simply a home for the tech community. I believe that the same fundamental principals are in play however, and that the task of building a commercialization engine in this city is not a real estate problem, but a social one.

    I don’t know what this means for MaRS and their efforts in the community, but I hope it is a chance for them to step back and refocus. They have a great team that I believe will still do great things.