• Up-Start Competition 2009

    Update from Tony Redpath at MaRS:

    “An important correction – the actual competition runs from 2:00 PM to 5:00 PM on the 29th, with the class party starting at 5:00 PM and running to 7:00 PM. (12 pitches x 15 minutes = 3 hours, hence the 2 – 5). Anyone can attend to watch the pitches – but they will have to sign an NDA at the door since many entrants will have to disclose confidential ideas in order to make their pitch. The party is wide open however …and the winner of the competition will be announced, a large cheque handed out etc. I will have non-confidential summaries of each pitch available for interested parties, and they can buttonhole any team that interests them. We’ve got a great crop this year.”

    CIBC_Ent101-250px The MaRS Entrepreneurship 101 is coming to a close for the 2009 season. The season ending wrap party, aka Up-Start Competition, is happening on April 29, 2009 from 5:00-7:00pm at MaRS. Twelve (12) companies will be pitching a 10 minute presentation followed by 5 minutes of questions to a panel of three judges. Unfortunately, the judges are not currently listed on the site. However, a quick assumption is that it is probably someone from MaRS Venture Group (Tony Redpath or Peter Evans), a successful past entrepreneur and a local venture investment professional.

    The twelve entrants selected from the executive summary stage each give a 10-minute presentation, with a further five minutes for questions, to a panel of three judges on a day in late April (date to be confirmed). Presentations will be made under cover of a non-disclosure agreement that all audience members will be required to sign. The judges will pick the winner on that day and the first prize of $10K will be awarded. (Note that the prize will be paid out against an approved expenditure program that advances the business upon which the pitch was based.)

    All of the presentations will be judged against the following criteria:

    • Has the summary/presentation clearly articulated the value proposition?
    • Has the summary/presentation demonstrated competitive differentiation/intellectual capital?
    • Has the summary/presentation demonstrated a business model that makes money?
    • Has the summary/presentation demonstrated market awareness?
    • How effective was the overall presentation?
    • Would you invest?

    Should be a great night of pitches from the Entrepreneurship 101 class. See you there.

    What: Up-Start Competition 2009
    The Up-Start Competition is a business pitch competition open to participants enrolled in CIBC Presents Entrepreneurship 101. Individuals, or teams of individuals, have to give a ten minute presentation on an idea for a technology based business that they wish to implement (or, if appropriate, for a business that they have already started). They are expected to apply the concepts that they have learned from the course to their business idea, and to make a compelling case that this will lead to a very successful business.
    When: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM
    Where: MaRS

    101 College St
    Toronto, ON   Canada
  • Weekend Reading

    • RT @johnelton iNovia’s latest investment: Collective Media $20 million in Series B led by Accel Partners http://bit.ly/l78LV (corrected) #
    • RT @stoweboyd:Open Enterprise 2009: Jeremiah Owyang Inteview http://bit.ly/gfTBi 53% of marketers increased social media investment #oe09 #
    • RT @TechCrunch:Venture Capital Fundraising Is Down Nearly 40 Percent In First Quarter of 2009 http://bit.ly/Frpbx by @erickschonfeld #
    • Canada’s StumbleUpon a startup again, having been divested by eBay – http://tinyurl.com/c8v26a #
    • Check out projects from Ryerson’s Web 2.0 Competition (aka CPS630). We need more of these classes across Canada – http://tinyurl.com/dmyn8z #
    • RT @davidcrow:Room booked Apr 23 for TO entrepreneur community convo. cpcty is 24. DM me why you want to particpate & what you bring to … #
    • Learn more about the meaningless paperwork choking off foreign direct investment in Canada: http://www.vcrants.com/?p=76 #
    • having server issues. Should be resolved soon #
  • Incubators, accelerators, and ignition

    I am still curious about startup incubators. Mostly because I think that they do a great job focusing attention and driving buzz around the startup activities in a community. ReadWriteWeb has a great summary of seed fund incubators, including:

    I keep wondering why there isn’t an tech incubator in Toronto. We have a Fashion Incubator, a Food Business Incubator, a Research Centre with Advisory Services for entrepreneurs, 2 great universities with business and engineering schools located downtown with active student entrepreneurship groups: Rotman New Ventures Group and StartMeUpRyerson, entrepreneur focused events like StartupEmpire, Founders & Funders, Dicovery09, TiEQuest, Impact Conference and a few active seed investors (Scott Pelton and Roger Chabra at GrowthWorks, Rick Segal at JLA Ventures/Blackberry Fund, Derek Smyth at Edgestone).

    Maybe we don’t need an incubator. But LaunchBox and DreamIt have been successful in building the local communities in Washington, DC and Philadelphia respectively. And there are local entrepreneurs heading to Y Combinator, there is a need and a desire for the benefits these programs bring for the entrepreneurs and the community.

    All of these programs provide:

    • A cohort
    • Mentorship & Networking
    • Training
    • Funding
    • Timelines
    • Attention

    I wonder if the best Toronto specific program would include a distributed community approach to access the available resources. There is a strong community and a strong series of events that could facilitate a similar program locally. The community of entrepreneurs can find a way to build a similar program informally using many of the existing events and activities.

    A Cohort

    This is easy enough to define, however, potentially difficult to recreate in a distributed manner.

    Y Combinator, LaunchBox, TechStars, Capital Factory all use an application process and timelines to define a cohort of companies. The number of companies is defined by the amount of available resources:

    • Available funding
    • Mentor availability
    • Training spots

    The process should be easy to replicate from the above mentioned incubators. Plus all applicants must present their idea using Ignite format or a demo at a DemoCamp style event. The goal would be to help identify the best prospects, create excitement to find potential funding or at least to fine them the appropriate first mentors.

    Having a shared space helps to begin to build shared experiences. Like grad school, where everyone shares the triumphs and challenges because of the close proximity. It’s not dependent to have a shared office space, but common meetings, shared mailing lists, badges of honour, and shared timelines can help entrepreneurs feel part of something that is bigger. As the program evolves it becomes a shared pedigree, much like an alumni program. You can see this developing from the Y Combinator cohorts, i.e., YC Summer 08, TechStars 08 etc.

    Mentorship and Networking

    There are a great number of individuals engaged in the community with varying levels of success and experience. Many of these folks would make great mentors, they just need to be asked and engaged. Here is my list of folks that need to be involved (in no particular order):

    There are mentors in Toronto. It’s just a matter of finding the right people based on the company and problem space. The question is how to compensate a m

    entor/advisor will need to be addressed at some point. But I think that at this early stage, most mentors should be doing this to help young entrepreneurs. Compensation is something that each of the new school incubators solves with their funding equation. Not always possible during these early stages, most mentors can look to programs like TiE or CYBF which are volunteer driven programs. The goal should be to provide time-limited direction and guidance based on domain expertise. The CYBF program requires that mentors meet with a startup for “ a minimum of 4 hours per month”. This is one lunch a week. It also limits the number of startups that each mentor should engage with.

    Training

    A program should take advantage of the existing training opportunities and create a few new opportunities.

    The active programs that happen in Toronto include:

    • MaRS Entrepreneurship 101 – an approximately 32 week program that runs October to May. Best part all of the previous training videos available on Vimeo.
    • MeshU – business, management, technology and design for entrepreneurs. Some good stuff.
    • StartupEmpire – happened last year, we’ll try to make it happen again
    • Founders Lunch – run by John & Gosia at LearnHub. Great way for entrepreneurs to connect with each other. No funders or others around.
    • Founders & Funders – a monthly opportunity to connect with other founders and the people that fund companies. This will include invitees from Toronto, Montreal, Waterloo, Vancouver, Boston and Silicon Valley.
    • Refresh Events – interesting mix of technology, marketing, entrepreneurship and design training lectures at the Centre for Social Innovation
    • This training coupled with a weekly dinner program with a guest speaker from the local community. The weekly dinners will serve as a coming together point for the cohort, but also as a great introduction to the cohort. There is the question of cost. But obviously it might be limited by the resources and the size of the cohort. There will be lots of pho, dim sum, and pizza.

    Funding

    Every time I try to run the numbers it doesn’t make any sense to run this as a fund. The fund is too small to operate on the fees and the carry. And unfortunately, I don’t know a single individual that is willing to use $10M and try this as an investment thesis. Or a group of angels that need this for dealflow and risk reduction. There are some funds (GrowthWorks, JLA/BlackBerry Fund, ExtremeVP, iNovia Capital, TechCapital) that are doing seed stage funding in Canada. It is extremely difficult to run an early-stage fund of this nature and make the numbers work for operations and to compensate a staff to run it.

    There is an opportunity to create a Farm Team Fund (FTF) that assume a zero IRR and start funding these early stage entrepreneurs. The funding is a big challenge. We need to make sure both the extremely early capital and the follow on capital is available to help these companies sustain until profitability. 

    Timelines

    • Capital Factory = 10 weeks
    • TechStars = 12 weeks (May to August)
    • Y Combinator = ~12 weeks (June – August)
    • Seedcamp = 1 week + 12 weeks
    • LaunchBox = ~12 weeks (May 18 – Aug 5)

    Looks like 3 months is the magic number. That makes the 32 week program (October to May) for MaRS Entrepreneurship 101 program too long. The program needs to be focused on generating successful companies and entrepreneurs quickly.

    Attention

    What are the premier potential  events in Toronto? DemoCamp? Mesh? OCE Discovery? Are any of these events equivalent of Demo or TechCruch50 or Y Combinator Demo Days?  What is the event that attracts press, later stage investors, potential acquirers to find out about these companies? How do we highlight the great startups that are happening?

    This is the one thing missing from the local ecosystem. A killer launch event. Currently if you want real attention, you are probably launching at a US event. In Vancouver, there is LaunchParty which turns out is cofounded by the team running BootupLabs which were part of the BarCampVancouver, DemoCampVancouver and NorthernVoice teams. It’s one moDemoCampToronto is a good starting point, however, it was designed as a monthly gathering for the local entrepreneurial technologists and designers to share what they are working on. It is a good local event for driving attention, attracting and hiring talent and getting that first sanity check.

    What’s next?

    It’s possible for local entrepreneurs to replicate many of the features of the new school venture creation programs. The funding challenges related to a zero IRR can make this a challenge, but Rick and others have stepped up to the plate to bring attention to bear and hopefully solve this for early-stage entrepreneurs. It would be a lot easier to start with an application and funding process, the $6,000-$30,000/founder isn’t a lot of money, but it does help pay the rent and food bill during the 12 week dash.

    Are there a group of young entrepreneurs that want a program? Are you looking for a 12 week startup program in Toronto?

  • Weekend Reading

  • Let the Sparks Fly

    Earlier this week, Brightspark’s Mark Skapinker got “quoted saying some harsh things” in the Wall Street Journal. The gist of the post was that “the venture capital model was broken in Canada” and that “there are no significant repeat entrepreneurs here.” Understandably, passions were inflamed…

    nero

    Wellington’s Mark McQueen took issue with several points in the article. JLA’s Rick Segal likened the WSJ post to friendly fire or getting hit from behind. Mark Skapinker has since posted a clarification of sorts.

    While the WSJ post was off message, there really is a problem up here. It is not a lack of good ideas or backable founders. The pool of available financing is drying up. A global problem, sure. But our pond is smaller, so we’ll feel the pain sooner.

    There are those who will argue the rules are changing, that to start something less funding is needed than ever before. Maybe so. But there is a difference between running lean… and starving. We are simply not feeding our young. It is beyond short sighted, it is economic suicide.

    Provincial governments seem to know this is happening, that there is a risk of losing a generation of entrepreneurs, companies, jobs, growth. They are announcing programs left and right (albeit with seemingly little industry consultation), but letting meaningless paperwork kill cross border deals.

    Financiers definitely know something is amiss, funds are not or can not raise another round. Instead of closing on a fresh $100M, they are closing up shop. But if they didn’t deliver returns, can you blame LPs? Typical venture funds need to deploy large amounts of capital to move the needle. They aren’t in the seed stage investing business, their business model does not allow it. It is possible that there just weren’t enough seed stage opportunities to choose from… maybe.

    So more early stage financing for more companies, it is easy to like the sound of that. Unfortunately, it is just not that easy. There really is not much money to be made doing this. Run the numbers for yourself, we have, it is not a particularly scalable venture so to speak. And still it needs doing.

    One thing is for sure: this problem isn’t going to solve itself…

  • Weekend Reading

  • ParkVu launch iTunes to Blackberry app

    i2b - iTunes Library on your BlackBerry Jeff Fedor and Terry Goertz of ParkVu launched i2b service today. The service allows BlackBerry Bold, Curve and Storm users to remotely retrieve their music their iTunes libraries.

    i2b makes some assumptions about user behaviour that allows the application to automatically sync users music to their BlackBerry. The i2b service is limited to 1Gb or 100 files. This requires users (and the applications’ designers) to make a decision about which music to sync by default. The i2b application makes some initial assumptions that Favorite Playlists, 25 most played tracks, and most recent iTunes library additions are the files that should be sync’d out of the box. It’s a great starting point for users and can be configured by users after the fact.

    The service creates a sync’d intermediate store of up to 1Gb or 100 songs in the cloud allowing users to access the sync’d files on their BlackBerry devices.

    Songs on their home computer can be retrieved even when it’s off. Up to 100 tracks (1GB maximum) from the i2b user’s iTunes library will be replicated to the Internet cloud, making them available from their BlackBerry even when their desktop or laptop is turned off. When their computer is on and connected to the Internet, all of their iTunes playlists are available on demand to their BlackBerry. Users can easily set i2b not to receive updates in areas where extra roaming charges would apply. i2b combines a BlackBerry application with a small application for the user’s home computer that works in the background with iTunes to allow users to replicate their playlists on their BlackBerry. i2b maintains any DRM restrictions and preserves the integrity of the user’s iTunes library.

    Hopefully the ParkVu team is able to quickly get i2b into the BlackBerry App World to enable broader distribution for their $2.99/month service. It would be fantastic to see them get similar exposure and distribution as Viigo in the BlackBerry App World’s Featured section.

  • New Ventures BC Competition is now open

    new ventures bc competitionNew Ventures BC is a competition for BC startups that has been running since 2003. The competition is open to new companies that have “not yet secured significant financing from “outside investors” (ie. investors other than friends, family, and company founders)”. The competition costs $100 to enter and is open to B.C.-based privately held companies (full eligibility requirements).

    Registration for the 2009 New Ventures BC Competition is now open! Competition deadline is April 20th, 11:59pm.

    REGISTER NOW

    The new 2009 prize structure includes:

    • $120,000 British Columbia Innovation Council First-prize package
    • $63,000 British Columbia Innovation Council Second-prize package
    • $37,000 British Columbia Innovation Council Third-prize package
    • BC Hydro Sustainability $40,000 prize
    • BC Bioenergy Network $20,000 prize
    • British Columbia Innovation Council Economic Impact $20,000 prize

    If you’re an early-stage entrepreneur with a new technology business idea, join us!

    For details and to register for the competition, visit http://www.newventuresbc.com or call 604-725-5740.

    Competition deadline is April 20th.

    The questions and evaluation criteria are very interesting set of metrics for any startup looking to raise money. The questions are not all encompassing, but they are an extremely complete list of the types of discussion that is required during the initial fund raising. Check out Round 2: Feasability Test and Round 3: Venture Plan of the Contest Rules for details about what your business plan should cover.

    1. Product/Service: Describe your product or service and the nature of the technology.
    2. Technology Development: Describe the development stage of your product/service.
    3. Team: Describe your company’s strengths and weaknesses. List the credentials of your technical and management teams, and if applicable, advisors and board of directors. If you don’t have a team, describe the key positions and critical skill sets that you need to add.
    4. Business Plan Status: What research has been conducted, what remains to be done, and how and when you anticipate doing so. What key sources are included to document and support your plan?
  • Weekend Reading

  • OCE Elevator Pitch contest at Discovery 09

    discovery2009_logo The Ontario Centres for Excellence is hosting an Elevator Pitch contest on May 12, 2009 at Discovery 09 event. First place prize is Cdn$5000 and second place is Cdn$2000. Not shabby for a 700 word entry.

    Step into OCE’s Elevator Pitch contest – 12 May 2009
    Metro Convention Centre, Toronto

    Venture capitalists and angel investors can spot a good business pitch in roughly the time it takes to ride an elevator. Test your pitch by getting in on the Elevator Pitch at Discovery 09. Go one-on-one, face-to-face with leading VCs and angel investors and deliver a compelling overview of your tech-based business idea in five minutes or less. Capture their attention, advice, and a chance to win cash prizes for best pitch.

    To enter, visit www.ocediscovery.com/elevatorpitch2009.aspx.

    Startups need to submit a 700 word maximum submission that covers the following:

    • Describe the product or service and its underlying technology
    • What is the market need – what is the value proposition to your intended customers?
    • What is the sustainable competitive advantage of your product or service?
    • Describe the market and market size.
    • What is your market entry strategy?

    Submissions are due by April 16, 2009.