Category: Toronto

  • The Do's and Don'ts of Raising Capital

    The Wellington Financial Blog is probably one of the most underrated in Canada. Not only are these guys the real-deal, but they have some serious guts and don’t pull punches for anyone.

    Yesterday they published a great but simple list: The Do’s and Don’ts of Raising Capital. The blog is not startup focused specifically, you can think of it as a Bay Street version of StartupNorth, but the topics are worth reading about when you have time. They also have the occasional scoop on Bay Street gossip, like today’s (or should I say, yesterday’s, or last month’s) CIBC news.

    Do?s:

    1. When you ask to meet with an prospective investor, have a defined amount or money in mind, or at least a range, and know what the use of proceeds will be.

    2. Prepare an overview, and there?s nothing wrong with PowerPoint. The pitch can be 15-25 slides long. No one needs a 50 page deck for the first meeting; there?s no way you?ll get through it all during the first session in any event (see below).

    3. Ask for 60 minutes, and no more. That should be all that you need for the 1st meeting.

    4. Show up on time.

    5. If you are bringing your own laptop, make sure you know what you plan to do with it during the meeting: run the show on a wall, link in to an overhead projector, etc.

    6. If you feel you need a non-disclosure agreement executed prior to the meeting, don?t be surprised that the prospective investor might want you to sign their own – rather than yours. If you see 100 or more companies a year, you can imagine how hard it would be for the investor to execute 100 different NDAs.

    7. Review the website of the investor prior to the meeting. If you don?t know what type of firm it is (equity vs. debt vs. LSIF vs. agent vs. principal), you might be wasting your time – and theirs.

    8. If you are going to engage an agent, make sure you know what role you want them to play. Some deals benefit from an outside advisor, and some may not. As much as VCs don?t like to think that entrepreneurs feel the need to spend part of the raise on fees, one wouldn?t do a deal with lawyers or accountants. But if you get an agent involved (and sometimes that agent/advisor can also be a lawyer or an accountant if they have the specific expertise), use them for the hard stuff, like telling you what is practical on the key negotiating items, what?s ?market?, and so forth.

    9. If you get a term sheet and are trying to compare one investor?s proposal to another, make sure you ask about prior deal references. The price/terms of a deal are only part of the decision-making process, or at least they shouldn?t be the sole criteria. Ask to speak to a couple of prior investee companies, and ask how many deals have closed in the past year or two. Do at least some due diligence on the group you are talking to, as not all teams/funds are the same – by a long shot.

    Don?ts:

    1. Don?t send a 10 page NDA to a firm. This is the deal: we investors promise to not steal your idea or tell a competitor about it. We promise to keep your private data private. We promise not to poach staff we meet during the process. That shouldn?t take 10 pages to document.

    2. Don?t ask for a meeting, pitch your story, and show a forecast that ?isn?t board approved?. If you aren?t yet ready to raise capital, why ask for the meeting?

    3. Don?t go into a pitch without knowing ?where your existing investors live?. That?s code for: know whether or not the current investors will play on the upcoming round or not.

    4. Don?t send a PDF of your financial model. It?ll only make the investor wonder why you don?t want to share the working excel version.

    5. If you are raising anything post an Angel round, don?t ask for a meeting if you don?t have a financial model ready. Having a pitch meeting and then sending a model a couple of weeks later ensures that 1) the iron may now no longer be hot, 2) the VC might have come to an uneducated, yet quick, no, or 3) you?ll seem disorganized, which may be normal for early stage companies but not a confidence-builder.

    6. Don?t compare yourself to Google, as in: ?What we?re doing is more robust than Google?, ?What we?re doing is harder than Google?, or ?We are going to be the next Google?.

    7. Don?t bring five or six company people to the first meeting. There are rarely enough chairs anyway, and don?t some of these people have jobs that don?t involve raising capital?

    8. Don?t say you?ll send follow-up material ?in a couple of days?, and then go silent for several weeks. If you ask for a meeting to raise capital, and the prospective investor is interested, be conscious that they see 500 or more ideas a year and can?t possibly waste five minutes let alone a couple of hours.

    9. When you do send forecasts, don?t send a budget that shows revenue going from, say, $1 million this year to $100 million in three years? time. People will think – fair or not – that you?ve lost your mind.

    10. When talking future valuation, don?t use numbers that involve ?billions?. As in, ?We?ll be worth north of a billion by 2012?. People will think – fair or not – that you?re on crack.

    11. Don?t be offended if the investor turns you down, as long as they are polite about it.

  • TIEQuest Business Plan Competition – Deadline January 31st

    tietorontologojpeg.jpgIn case you weren’t already aware, TIE Toronto (an entrepreneur support group in Toronto) is holding TIEQuest.

    TIEQuest is a business plan competition which promises that “the winners will receive an ?Expression of Interest? for up to $1 million of investment from sponsoring firms and various cash prizes and incentives exceeding $150,000 in value.” The overall winner gets an immediate $50,000 prize along with the $1,000,000 prize.

    If any of you are going to participate in this, let us know, we’d love to keep an eye on it.

  • OmniDate.com – Virtual Dating is the new Starbucks

    OmniDate LogoOmniDate, based in Toronto, has been hard at work building a virtual date technology and it’s likely we’ll see their avatars coming to big name dating sites soon. We’ve all heard about sex in Second Life, the truth however is a lot less steamy; most people have a hard time getting Second Life installed and running on their machine.

    Unlike Second Life, OmniDate intends for its avatar dating system to be used by real people who want to set up real life dates. Going on a virtual date is less time consuming, less expensive, and more secure than meeting at a local Starbucks. Once you’ve found someone you enjoy chatting with online, it is more likely you’ll enjoy meeting that person in the real world. My guess is that people will also use OmniDate to flirt, etc.

    There are quite a few things to like about OmniDate’s approach:

    • It is entirely flash based, this means there is no download, installation, or PhD required. This increases adoption.
    • Rather than putting all their eggs in one basket and building a brand around virtual dating, OmniDate is starting out licensing its technology to established players with large audiences and strong brands. This increases their likelihood of success, sidesteps the cost of acquiring initial users, and removes the burden of building brands for each market segment.

    OmniDate AvatarsDon’t think dating sites would be interested? Guess again. Technologies like this increase the entertainment value of dating sites (read: ad impressions), keep users subscribed longer (read: recurring revenue), and get users comfortable interacting with each other (read: higher conversion).

    OmniDate is already working with some large dating sites who plan to use the virtual date technology on their sites. Is now the time for avatars to go mainstream? I can confidently say increased interaction makes sense and it is safe bet online dating will evolve past profiles to entertainment experiences. Give OmniDate’s recently launched demonstration site a try for yourself and leave your thoughts in the comments.

    Taking off my rose colored glasses for a second, I think OmniDate has a few things it could improve:
    – I read all about the challenges Pixar designers had with Ratatouille. Test audiences noticed if the color of lettuce wasn’t just right, Pixar spent an inordinate amount of time on the color green. Likewise 3D human avatars can go from cool to creepy very quickly. I was thrown off by the laugh an avatar makes when you type ‘LOL’, touching another person’s avatar is also a touchy matter. The avatar experience is still a little rough around the edges; that said, I think the team will iterate quickly and continue to improve the already good design.
    – OmniDate has a room builder in the works, I would like to see an avatar builder also. You wouldn’t want your date thinking you are a super model would you…

    OmniDate was founded by Igor Kotlyar, a serial entrepreneur who has already successfully built and sold a startup. OmniDate is a 6 person team and growing fast; they are interested in meeting with avatar designers and licensing partners.

    Contact: Igor Kotlyar, Founder

  • Founders and Funders Dinner Toronto – January 21st, 2008

    90546828.png

    David Crow and I have been using some of our vacation time to organize a Founders and Funders dinner on January 21st in Toronto. It will be at Monsoon downtown and will bring together 75 Founders, CEOs, Angels and VCs to meet in a quiet setting to discuss the Toronto and Canadian startup and early stage environment.

    Event details are on upcoming.org

    110338403_2c4b1e9527_m.jpgThe Toronto tech and community scenes have exploded over the past couple of years. We often hear about successful entrepreneurs or interesting startups but finding the time to attend all of the events and meet interesting people isn’t easy.

    The Toronto Founders & Funders Dinner was organized to get the Toronto tech entrepreneurs to meet each other; meet potential funders: angel, VC, government, or other; to have a fun social evening where we see how we can help each other create the next big successful company.

    The first dinner is limited to 75 people

    What is Founders and Funders?

    Founders and Funders is a social event for entrepreneurs and funders conceived by Austin Hill and Patrick Lauzon in Montreal. The Toronto event is using this formula to help connect the community in Toronto. The goal is to provide connections between entrepreneurs, angel investors, venture capitalists and others with a direct interest in creating the next big successful company.

    If you are interested in attending, please contact us or David for more information. Updates will be posted on foundersandfunders.org

  • GameOn: Finance – Startup Passes available

    gameonfinance.png GameOn: Finance is a conference focused on helping gaming companies understand their financing options. The conference takes place in Toronto on January 17th and 18th and is being put on by Interactive Ontario

    “Interactive Ontario is pleased to announce the new Start-Up Pass for GameON: Finance, to assist small games companies “on the rise” in gaining access to this unique opportunity to meet face-to-face with the investment community, as well as to network and become more acquainted with the gaming community.”

    To make sure that startups can all afford to make it, the organizers are providing discounted tickets to qualified companies. In order to be eligible for the Start-Up Pass, you must have:

    • 5 staff members or less;
    • been in operation for less than 3 years; and
    • made, or plan on making games your core business.

    The number of startup passes available is limited and they are being provided on a first-come first-served basis. You can sign up here. The full schedule for the conference is available here.

    (more…)

  • CommunityLend Raises $2.5M

    Community LendSocial lending is coming to Canada. Founded more than a year ago by Michael Garrity and Colin Henderson and following the successful model of Zopa in the UK and Prosper in the U.S., CommunityLend will be launching a P2P lending service in Canada.

    P2P lending works like this. Borrowers provide their details to CommunityLend, including a public profile and reason for the loan. CommunityLend performs a credit check on the borrowers and then posts the borrower’s story, profile and credit rating to a community of prospective lenders/investors in an eBay-like interface. Investors then bid on pieces of the loan (each loan is typically divided up among many lenders which mitigates everyone’s risk). After the bidding process the loan is then issued at the minimum rate required to satisfy enough lenders to fund the full amount.

    The company will be offering, at first, one standard type of loan – 3 years, fixed rates to a maximum of 25k. Judging by other services like Prosper.com, social lending seems to fill a gap in the product offering of a traditional bank. Rates are typically in the 10-18% range, which fits above bank rates for unsecured lines of credit and below that of high interest credit cards. CommunityLend makes money by charging a small spread to both the borrower and the lender.

    With the current “sub-prime” troubles in global credit markets, the timing may be perfect for CommunityLend. Banks in Canada and the US have been tightening their credit policies making borrowing more difficult, especially for marginal creditors. The transparent, market-based P2P model may well prove to be a solution than can judge and price loans in this segment better than the big institutions.

    In addition to the funding announcement (of mostly non-Canadian investment dollars btw), CommunityLend is also announcing a new slate of directors including Barry Campbell, former MP and Secretary to the Minister of Finance and Jim Jones CEO of GMAC Residential Capital [100B lending portfolio].

    Congratulations to the team for reaching this milestone. We look forward to providing a more thorough review of the lending service once it goes live (we’re told early to mid next year).

    For the time being you can get more info at the company’s newly launched website: CommunityLend.com.

  • Homestars.com – Reviews of Home Improvement Companies

    homestars.pngHomestars.com is a publicly accessible reviews site that does not require any registration in order to read reviews. Posting reviews requires an account. Homestars is focused solely on the “home improvement companies and resources for homeowners” niche.

    Homestars’ focus on a single vertical is smart and they are executing on it well. The most specific advantage of this approach is that selling targeted advertising at a premium will be much easier for HomeStars, who have very specifically motivated users in the home improvement space. These people are ready and willing to spend money, and if HomeStars can get them to the site, there is no doubt that advertisers will be ready to pay.

    Perhaps it is a result of the narrow focus of the site, but the user interface is very easy to navigate and it is a lot of fun to just dive in and start (as I did) looking for pissed off people skewering their plumber or driveway repairman. As you dive in you will notice “Sponsored Ads” on some pages. If you look up a review for Plumber Bob, who seems like an honest and hardworking guy, you will see that Canada Wide Plumbing & Mechanical Services Inc. have a “sponsored” ad on Plumber Bobs page. To get one of the premium spots, and to add pictures and a few other things to your own page, you pay a monthly fee of $80. These premium spots make up the bulk of HomStars’ revenue.

    Because people often want a review of something as specific as a Plumber or a Roofer only intermittently, I think HomeStars have done the right thing in making the site as public as possible. Home Rennovations is a niche that has been overlooked so far and unlike books, music, travel, or cars, it has been hard to get decent local reviews of these services.

    hsreviews.pngHomestars have also recently done a deal to provide their review data to another Toronto based startup: ZipLocal.com, who, as we have mentioned before, appear to be treading water and perhaps are hoping that bringing in more high-quality review content will generate some additional traffic. I think HomeStars has to be careful about licensing their reviews outside of Homestars.com; I am not sure that when a user enters a review on HomeStars the user expects it to be syndicated.

    The most glaring problem for HomeStars is accountability. As far as I can tell there is no way to see what other reviews a particular user has posted, so it is hard to know if a review is just a one-off from someone, or if they are an established and helpful reviewer. I think HomeStars will need some sort of scoring system that gets applied to the individual reviewers, based on their participation. Otherwise, HomeStars risks filling up with spam reviews.

  • homestars, gigpark – Reviews of stuff

    Toronto is currently in the throws of labour, giving birth to two distinct but potentially competitive review services.

    Homestars.com and Gigpark are both, at their core, places to post reviews. In the case of Homestars, their current focus is on home renovators and service providers (an industry that needs to have some accountability injected in to it!). Gigpark, is more generalist in its approach, but layers a social network on as the main hook. The idea being that you will trust reviews from people you know more than you will trust reviews from just anyone.

    I think both approaches have a few strengths and a few glaring weaknesses. First up for review is HomeStars.com, and we will take a look at GigPark later on.

  • iBegin – From Local Search To Business Data

    ibegin logoiBegin has been doing all the right things, right from the beginning. It wasn’t that iBegin had the perfect business model from the start, they didn’t. Very few startups do, but instead of getting stuck on one idea, they have transformed within their niche and have shot in to profitability.

    iBegin started out as an experiment: a user generated local search site for Yorkville, a ritzy 4 block neighborhood in downtown Toronto. The number of visits to the hyper local site surprised Ahmed Farooq, the site’s founder, so he started exploring purchasing business listings to expand. Dealing with the data providers proved to be a big hassle. Worse still, the data providers used opaque variable pricing schemes and demanded princely sums. And so iBegin discovered a business opportunity, hassle-free fairly-priced business listings: iBegin Source.

    iBegin charges $1000 per state or province, $40,000 for the entire US, and $8,000 for all of Canada. Customers love the transparent pricing. iBegin has already made over 50 sales, 80% of which required no interaction or hand holding. And it is not just customers that have noticed iBegin… this year Ahmed received (and turned down) a buyout offer in the low seven digits.

    ibegin logoAs a local search engine, iBegin used to compete with Toronto based and venture backed startup Ziplocal, which has undergone several redesigns and appear to be struggling with the local search business model.

    It is worth reading iBegin’s philosophy. Notice what they didn’t have from the start: “iBegin was not created by a dozen people brought together to work on it. It didn’t have a CEO and CFO and other related positions. It didn’t have bankers and venture capitalists backing it with millions, helping finance user research groups, and hiring expensive and unneeded consultants and advisers.”

    Ahmed is no one trick pony. He has a number of other ventures including: vB Skins, Is My Home, and the Bloggy Network. Building a stable of successful businesses and reinvesting those cash flows, instead of raising outside financing, has allowed allowed iBegin to experiment, iterate, and evolve. Getting to product/market fit is a significant achievement.

    There are many opportunities for iBegin going forward. Next year we’ll see iBegin expanding into other English speaking countries and offering categories (e.g. health, legal) in addition to regions. How does Ahmed do do it? By listening to customers and bootstrapping his way to a big success.

    Contact: Ahmed Farooq
    Blog: www.techsoapbox.com

  • StartupCampToronto is tomorrow – open to all (8:30pm)

    So, StartupCampToronto is tomorrow. Jonas and I are pretty sure we have taken care of everything we possibly can. Don’t forget for those who have tickets: Things start at 6pm

    As you probably know, we have tried to keep the numbers for this event at a reasonable level. Our hope is that the presenting startups will get valuable feedback that can help their business. We have felt bad about turning down a lot of people who have requested tickets after the fact.

    If you don’t have a ticket, we still want you to come hang out. We have made arrangements to take over No Regrets at about 8:30pm to hang out and get to know all the cool startups who will be there. If you get there on time, you will be there just in time to hear a slew of really great announcements.

    What? StartupCamp After Party

    Where? No Regrets, 42 Mowat Ave, Toronto

    When? 8:30pm

    What else? Demos tables manned by a handful of fantastic startups

    You will also have a chance to hang out with the presenting companies.

    And finally, the people who put up the money to make this happen: