Author: Jonas Brandon

  • Delusions of Facebook – Should you be a Facebook Startup?

    You can’t deny it: Facebook Applications have been a hot topic from the day the Facebook API was announced 5 months ago. Early success stories spread quickly, and the app-installation-fever that most users went through was overwhelming. Invitations to install this app and that one, we all had flooded inboxes.

    Here in Toronto, FaceBookCamp 1 and FacebookCamp 2 were wild successes with over 300 people in attendance at each. There are no surprises when Facebook takes over any conversation, and certainly not one about startups. StartupWeekend here in Toronto is now Facebook Weekend.

    I am a fan of Facebook, and have written my own predictions on how successful they will be.

    So, should you consider building your startup as a facebook app. Or is that, should you consider building a facebook app as a startup?

    I think there are a few fundamental problems with trying to do so, and I will try to explore those here. As a disclaimer: I have not tried to start a business on Facebook, I have just been an observer. I am also aware that there are some facebook apps which are doing quite well, and time will tell if they truly manage to cash-out.

    You cannot build a business on someone else’s platform when they don’t see you as a partner.
    This is the single biggest obstacle. Facebook does not see application developers as partners in any way. In fact, they forbid you from calling yourself a partner.

    The implications of this might not seem so bad up front. You are still getting access to a great API, lots of community-based support and most of all, you have access to Facebook’s 40-50 million users.

    The reality is more harsh however. You are putting yourself at the mercy of an organization that is growing at a phenomenal rate, you do not know what sort of value they prescribe to your, or any other, application and there are no guarantees about how long the platform will be as accessible as it is today.

    To make money, you need to have your own customers.
    To make real money, you need to have customers, even just users will do, but you have to have something.

    When you are building your business on Facebook, you won’t get either one. You get visits. Brief interactions with someone else’s users, and you have no control.

    Being able to move people from being visitors in to being customers is critical to building any sort of sustainable business. In order to generate any sort of sustained revenue, you need to be able to deliver ongoing value to your customer, so they can continue to either pay you, or click on your ads.

    If they don’t innovate, you die.
    You may or may not remember Compuserve, BBSs, AOL, and countless other internet beomouths. In their day, they were all the big thing, the had tens of millions of customers, doing billion dollar deals and they were bringing new customers in faster than you or I could count.

    The one common theme between all their stories? They have all gone away slowly and painfully.

    You may be able to build the most popular Facebook application there is, and you may be able to generate some cash through advertising or sponsorships, but one thing you won’t be able to do, when the time comes, is take your customers with you.

    When Facebook’s day does come, and it will come at some point, it will be your last day too. You won’t have a hope in hell in getting contact information or any other sort of data about your customers, because they were never your customers in the first place.

    This road has been travelled before.

    Your business is their feature
    The name Facebook Applications is misleading. You are building Facebook Features. Slideshows, Maps, Sticky Notes, all of it, they are all features.

    I don’t have to tell you that a feature is not a business, because you already know that. Don’t you?

    You have two options: Change or Die
    You are building your, *ahem* business *ahem* under the Facebook Terms of Service. While they may be relaxed and manageable now, Facebook can change them at any time.

    When that happens, you will have two options. You can do what they say and change your application, possibly removing things like advertisements, or you can go away and die. (And no, you can’t take your users with you).

    Treat your own customers well, and they reward you. Treat someone else’s customer well, and they are rewarded
    We have already established that you don’t have your own customers or users when building a Facebook Application. The kicker here is that you now have no incentive to enhance your ‘application’. The better job that you do, the more Facebook will benefit.

    You may being saying “aha, that means what you said above is invalid”. Well, almost. You see, at some point you begin to provide a diminishing return to Facebook. Their users are spending too much time in your application. At this point, Facebook has more to gain by making sure that you are no longer the flavor of the month, and they gain by having their customers go to other applications. The more people move around in Facebook, the more they benefit.

    Use Facebook as a conduit to your real business
    Facebook has almost 50 million users. You can’t argue with those sorts of numbers. This level of access to so many entrenched users is unusual.

    The opportunity is for you to extract a feature from your real business, and provide that feature as a Facebook Application. You can then try to link users through to your real website. If you are building something worthwhile, they will come there with you and you can focus on turning them in to real customers.

    The fact is, as a startup you should be focused on building something that is useful on its own. You need to create value that people are willing to pay you for, either with their attention or their own money. Until you can do that, you do not have a sustainable business. You have an experiment, a feature, an idea.

  • StartupCamp Waterloo – This is just getting started

    1732730724_69769af3d0_m.jpgJonas Brandon, David Crow and I made the trip from Toronto to Waterloo last night to attend StartupCamp Waterloo. Despite over 2 hours in traffic on the way there, we were happy that we went. What a great evening.

    The room wasn’t packed, but there were just the right number of people there. Things were kicked off with Ali Asara from Well.ca who took us through the ups and downs of his search for funding for his startup. Ali was incredibly compelling and more than made up for the fact that Albert Lai couldn’t make it in time. Ali, who Toronto recently lost to Guelph, is quickly becoming one of my favorite guys in the startup scene around here.

    I had intended to take notes on the evening, but I really just got too caught up in everything. After Ali’s presentation, it was time to have quick 2-minutes demos from a slew of startups, or potential startups. Despite some Facebook Delerium that was coursing around the room at times, which culminated in one startup being told to eschew any thought of making money and to just make a facebook app, there was a really genuine attempt to help each startup in thinking through their business plans and product development.

    The startups that presented, that I made note of, were

    • Village Toolbox ? Not yet launched. Wiki and social tools for actual, real-life, communities.
    • CastRoller
    • Zimride – A Facebook App
    • Purple ? Community managed band calendars
    • ContingencyWorks.com and his EpochBox idea.

    The startup that really got my attention was Village Toolbox. Simon Clark has built a social-software platform for his own community. While the product is in it’s infancy (it didn’t look very refined), and there are quite a few competitors in this space, I think Simon really kind of gets it. A lot of the competitive tools, which we use in my condo are ugly in their own way, and aren’t built with the community in mind. My guess is that there is a lot of room to innovate here, both with the product and with the localized revenue opportunities.

    1732730310_b8a7867ce5_m.jpgSimon’s question when he got up was: “should this stay as a hobby, or should I start taking it seriously”. My advice is: focus on the product, keep iterating it in your own community, and put it in a couple of others. Once you get it right, start spreading it out and then quit your day job when you can afford to, but no sooner.

    These startups were all very early stage, which will probably be the norm for events like this. There were a handful of more seasoned entrepreneurs in the audience however, and a lot of good advice flowed from them. It would be nice if startups would present some basic market research or target-audience information, because it can be hard to talk through problems without really understanding the end-user.

    This is just getting started
    By the time the evening was over, people were buzzing. The rapid-fire sessions, which nobody wanted to end, had us all excited. The entire event was very loosely planned, and it went off perfectly.

    Startups were invited, the number of attendees was kept low, and the organizers let the audience set the pace. We learned a lot of lessons. StartupCamp is unique from DemoCamp in that it isn’t about demoing cool technology just to show it off (a line that was very fine at times), but instead it is about demoing a startup or idea with the intention of taking feedback, and heckling, from the audience. The entire night reminded me a lot of the first DemoCamp here in Toronto.

    Keep the momentum going
    So, here is the deal. We are going to keep up our end of the bargain and we are going to be hosting StartupCampToronto1 (watch that page — too tired to fill it in now) using the same model.

    Now, the challenge we are sending out to all the other tech startup blogs: Run a StartupCamp in your city. Keep it simple and to the point. Let’s smoke out the entrepreneurs and see what, and who, is out there.

    StartupCongress planning continues to take place, but in the spirit of startups, let’s just do it.

  • Clay Tablet Technologies – Translation Middleware

    Clay Tablet Technologies, a Toronto, Ontario company made a few interesting announcements today. The first is that they are partnering with SDL as a partner to allow SDL clients to glue their translation technologies in to content management systems.

    Clay Tablet has an interesting position in the market. They sit between large content-focused systems, like a document management system or content management platform, and outside providers of translation services. Clay Tablet automatically manages the routing of content by connecting directly with content management systems, allowing for the immediate and automatic sending of content out for translation.

    What I love about this approach is that once they are deployed, Clay Tablet then plays a vital role in the relationship between the two additional vendors. This means that they can continue to build revenues while having to spend an order less of effort in servicing the customer.

    Their client list is growing impressively, and with today’s partnership announcement, we will undoubtedly be seeing a lot of new customers coming on board.

    Their second announcement today was that they are releasing version 2.0 of their product, which is a significant improvement over their previous versions.

    The long-term opportunity for Clay Tablet is significant. I don’t have to tell you how big the translation business is, or how much it is growing year over year. There is not a company in the world that doesn’t require translation services at some point, and by acting as an easily integrated middle-man, Clay Tablet can profit handsomely from that need.

    Contact Robinson Kelly, CEO

  • SlashID – Federated Identity Management

    Slash ID LogoSlashID launched today. The Toronto, Ontario based company is entering a market that has slain giants such as Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, and IBM among others. This is also the same general market that Vancouver-based SXIP is competing in, although they have a primarily enterprise-focused business model (where they compete with companies such as Australian Atlassian with its Crowd product).

    The most successful effort to date in the federated-credentials market has been OpenID, which has seen a lot of acceptance in the developer and service provider world, but still flounders in obscurity for the average internet user. So, the big question really is: is there a federated credentials business to be made at all? Or is this just a big dream?

    The benefit to the end user seems obvious: I have one login name and password to remember and no matter which site I go to, I can log in without going through signup hassles or having to reset a long-forgotten password. This has been the promise of every federated credential system to date, and it continues to be a major dream of companies such as Google and Microsoft, who feel that the credential and it’s attached identity are the keys to being the number one destination for web users.

    For website owners, the deal gets a little more complicated. Above all else, site owners feel like they are being asked to give up control for the sake of user convenience. The fact is though, there is very little evidence that tells site owners that users will bypass their site or application in favor of a competitor because they do not allow users to use an external authentication system. While the level of control being given up in reality is minimal, if any at all, perception remains the biggest enemy of federated credential systems.

    Will SlashID make a break for it? A strong endorsement on Mashable is a great start, and their focus on providing up-to-date and useful developer tools is smart. If SlashID can provide incentives to site owners to include them as a login option, then they could emerge as a clear leader.

    Contact: Colin Smillie

  • Savvica is Back – Payoff for holding on!

    savvica-logo.gifJohn and Malgosia Green started Savvica in Toronto three years ago. Savvica was run on a shoestring budget. John and Malgosia were hitting the pavement hard, working on financing deals, partnerships and generally promoting Nuvvo, a do-it-yourself online course community. It was hard, thankless work, and eventually it was time to make a decision. Running a startup out of your basement can be grueling. If you’ve been there, you can empathize, at some point you have to step back and re-asses.

    So, after 2 years, John and Malgosia decided to take jobs in San Francisco. The benefits were obvious: Gain loads of experience, keep working in startups (they didn’t file themselves away in boring jobs), make connections and give themselves some financial breathing room.

    johnandgosia.jpgHere is where their story takes a turn for the better however. Just when we all thought that Savvica was done for, John and Malgosia did the smart thing. They didn’t “go out of business”, or take down the site. They didn’t declare it a failure and start preaching about all the lessons they learned. Instead, they kept burning a little midnight oil, still looking for a deal or an opportunity, and most of all, they kept their dream alive.

    Well, hard work pays off and things have finally turned around for Savvica. They have taken investment from an India-based e-learning company that was happy to have Savvica headquarter itself anywhere in North America. John and Malgosia packed up their things and headed straight back to Toronto.

    If you know John and Malgosia, as most of us here in the Toronto tech scene do, you know they are not only hard working, but also incredibly helpful to other startups. We are all excited to have them back here in Toronto and we can’t wait to see them at DemoCamps, Torcamps and whatever other things are happening.

    Savvica is hiring a handful of Rails engineers and I am sure there will be more hiring soon.

  • Do you know a great wordpress designer?

    Startupnorth needs a better look. The current design, a hacked version of a free template, is pretty darn ugly. A lot of people comment on how ugly it is, so we figure it’s time for a change.

    So, please contact us with any suggestions or offers (if you are the great designer that you know!).

  • Mobivox takes $11 Million

    mobivoxlogo.jpgMobivox, a Montreal based startup has just raised $11 Million from IDG Ventures, Brightspark Ventures, and Skypoint Capital Corp.

    Mobivox is a value-added VOIP services provider focused on cell phones. They can let you connect to your own Skype account via your mobile, and can also handle your long distance calling. They also offer free calling to a huge number of countries.

    In some ways, their service is a sort of glorified calling card, having you dial an access number and then patching you through, but addons like Skype access, free calling to some countries, voice recognition, SMS Call Back, Conference Calling, Mobile-to-landline transfer and Group Calling all put Mobivox way ahead.

    It would be amazing if Mobivox started incorporating some GrandCentral like features, but my guess is that they will focus on building out their existing business first.

    Mark Evans had some kind words in his review of their service back when they first launched in May 2007.

  • Garage invests $2.5 Million in Lure Media, now a software startup

    MontrealTechWatch got to it first, Lure Media, a Montreal based company had a busy week last week. While the rest of us were filling up on Turkey, they closed a deal to purchase IMPACT, IS, the makers of two products: Impact Designer and Impact Showroom. Before that was done however, they signed off on $2.5 Million in funding from Garage Canada.

    Impact has been around for over 20 years, and is a well-established leader, Lure Media now seems set to position themselves primarily as a software provider with ancillary support services. They will also launch an entirely new piece of Business-to-Business software they are describing as: ” Business-to-Business Exchange supporting the global commercial and residential interior design industry. ETERIORS will link manufacturers of luxury lifestyle products to their respective dealers, interior design professionals and high-spend customers on a transactional, digital backbone that evolves into the standard network for electronic commerce and rich media in the global luxury lifestyle market.

    It is interesting to see Garage Canada play a role you might expect more traditional private equity group to handle. While this deal is probably the size Garage Canada is more comfortable with, the deal may have just been too small for the larger equity players, leaving a nice gap for Garage to fill with what is probably a safe bet in comparison to typical VC deals. The fact that they are launching a new product out of the merger also puts the deal closer to Garage’s territory.

  • b5Media Launching Spekked – The big part of the Long Tail

    picture-1.pngWhat happens when you’ve made a business out of publishing hundreds and hundreds of niche blogs? b5Media, a Toronto based startup that has taken funding in the range of US$2-million co-lead by Brightspark Ventures and J. L. Albright Venture Partners, is the owner of a vast amount of posts and articles on a few dozen subjects and finding new ways to capitalize on that asset can get tough.

    Today, b5 is taking a leap and is launching Spekked. The project is labeled “Beta”, which either means that the technology is young (it’s an aggregator of other b5media blogs, all based on one common subject), or it means the entire business idea is being tested. My guess is that it is a combination of both.

    As any startup begins to accumulate assets, it is critical to put them to good use. Like the guys at AideRSS, who previewed a set of tools at Democamp which uses their existing data, b5 is starting to zero in on larger segments of their market by combining many products (in this case, content) in to one re-focused stream which will have a much broader appeal. Spekked will also act as a funnel in to b5’s deeper offerings in that particular category.

    The challenge for this project will be to avoid losing readers who may stop reading 5 regular b5media blogs and instead just tune in to the one aggregated blog.

    If this works, you can bet there will be a lot of other branded combination blogs from b5 to come.

    We are working on a profile of b5media, which we hope to post soon.

  • ConceptShare – Online Collaboration

    images1.jpgSudbury, Ontario based ConceptShare is one of the best examples of a fast growing, healthy and original startup in Canada. They have gone from idea, to execution and now to business development in a short period of time. They have done it all from Sudbury.

    The idea was simple enough. You have any sort of artwork or video, and you need to bring in other people to help edit and refine your work. The old way of doing things was to email your files around and have people open them locally on their PC. With Conceptshare, your co-workers, partners and others can simply log in and see what you are working on, and they can offer their own suggestions right there on the spot. Collaborators can draw right on the screen, they can make notes and leave messages for eachother.

    I won’t go any further in to just what Conceptshare does, because their name is descriptive enough and their website is even more helpful. They also have one of the best demo movies of any startup out there.

    Differentiating in a muddled market
    “Collaboration” is not a new idea. The market for collaboration tools is endless and highly competitive. Instead of jumping in to that big, endless fight, ConceptShare worked hard to focus on a basic set of needs for what was initially a very defined market (graphic designers). By doing things right and in a smaller puddle, ConceptShare turned in to the perfect tool for a lot of things. They now have customers doing almost every sort of collaboration you can imagine, and they are just getting started at going after these new markets.

    ConceptShare also made one critical smart move up front. They didn’t try to do real-time collaboration. That would have included real-time audio chat, video chat and all sorts of extras that most customers don’t really want. Instead, they built their tool around how people really work: asynchronously. If you want me to review a document, or new graphic design, I don’t want to have to meet you online at a certain time to discuss it: I would rather just pop in and make notes when I have the time.

    A critical mistake that competing companies have made, in my view, is that they focused on real-time. Real-time requires a change in the user’s behavior, and trying to change behavior rather than compliment it is almost always a road to failure.

    Staying Focused
    Bernie, Scott and Chris have spent the last year and a half working on ConceptShare with incredible focus. Right from the beginning, when they were running around the first Mesh conference with their laptops, doing demos for potential investors, they have been role models of how to just do it when it comes to starting your own company. While a lot of would-be entrepenurs will wonder “should I do this”, etc.

    An Angel Round, and on to VC
    To really get off the ground, Conceptshare raised an undisclosed amount of Angel funding. The fact that they were able to get their funding in place so early is a testament not just to their great idea, but the hard work these guys continue to put in.

    The guys are now hitting the road to raise a round of Venture Capital. The decision to go down this road was not an easy choice for them to make. They tell me that they are more concerned with finding the right kind of VC than they are with just taking money from anyone. They are looking for a partner to help them grow the business.

    Overall, I think it is a smart move for a company in their position. They are arguably the market leaders in a space that is only just starting to come in to itself. I would be surprised if Scott, Bernie and Chris didn’t have their pick of VCs, as well as some pretty favorable terms. Let’s cross our fingers that they don’t end up having to go south like StumbleUpon, iUpload (now Awarness), or flickr.

    And now…
    This week ConceptShare has doubled it’s workforce and has brought on Will Pate to help drive the company ahead. Will is an experienced community builder and will be doing that, and I suspect other work, with ConceptShare. Hiring smart is critical and Scott, Bernie and Chris have been careful about who they bring on.

    So what else is next? A search shows that they own the domain conceptnation.com, which looks like a preview of some sort of new crowd-based marketplace or network. So, I am guessing that it won’t be long before the guys have big announcements coming out left and right.

    Contact: Scott Brooks