Author: Jonas Brandon

  • The only model that matters: Founders First

    Screen Shot 2013-02-22 at 8.55.58 AMThere are a lot of models that people throw around for how to build a strong startup community. There are a handful of types of players in each community, so there are many permutations of “who gets what” and how resources are moved around.

    It gets complicated, fast.

    So there is a model that I subscribe to. It can be a little myopic, it can be a little bit pigheaded, but it is always effective. It is the one metric that matters for startup communities and it is why we back the things we back and why we take exception to the things we do.

    In Halifax there has been a recent discussion about a local angel group and their funding model, which we do not believe is founder friendly. Hopefully this post will clarify for some people as to why we see things in such a black and white contrast.

    There is a litmus test that can get to the heart of many issues:

    • Does this help founders create more companies?
    • Does this help founders build better companies?

    You need a Yes on either one of those, otherwise the effort isn’t worth it.

    OK, there are more than just founders in the ecosystem, I know. The truth is however that Founders are the only ones who rely on everyone else in the ecosystem to be successful. Nobody else is so ecosystem dependant. Service providers can always find work elsewhere, investors can always squirrel their money in to safer places.

    It is founders and founders only are the assemblers, allocators and creators of resources that make successful startups. It is those successful startups which are the only things that demonstrate the success of the community.

    In early 2008 we started talking about how Startups Will Save Venture Capital in Canada. I believe that post and the thesis behind it has stood the test of time:

    My thesis is simple: Startups just aren’t getting started in Canada nearly as often as they should. This isn’t about education levels, creativity or even for a lack of cash floating around this country. This is about ambition.

    This is about hustle.

    Most entrepreneurs have heard that things aren’t great for VCs right now. LPs are shaky, some funds are crashing, others are just throwing their hands up, and for a lot of startups it seems like no matter how many people you pitch, you aren’t getting anywhere. I tried to put some hard number behind that, and they paint a scary picture.

    This goes two ways, and nobody wants to sit around while we all whine and moan that nobody can get funded. It’s time to build companies that are worth something.

    We need to focus on building our local startup communities more than ever. Local communities are important because they are far easier for local Angels and Entrepreneurs to connect to, and they also act as a great filter to help find people who need national and international exposure.

    (Read the rest . . .)

    David Crow started this thinking in 2005/2006 when he built the thesis that Community is the framework. That approach has brought incredible success to many startup communities. Founders are the anchor of community. Every year or so we publish the Hot Shit List and we focus on profiling founders who are taking pushing our communities to the next level.

    In an community it is the ability of founders to succeed through diligence, hard work and creative thinking that determines success. All encumbrances to founder success must be removed to achieve a sustainable model for growth.

    There is no half way, there is no “maybe” there is no “but…” there are just founders. Founders who are picking investors, lawyers, accountants, marketers, developers, product managers, customers and markets. It is founders who develop vision and create early product.

    It is only the founders who are tracking their cash, calculating runway and determining what is going to make their startup successful.

    So the next time someone tells you that anyone or anything matters then tell them that you will not water down a founders-first approach. Not because someone else needs a little something, not for any reason.

    Remember the great founders you know who have struggled against all odds to build incredible companies. Forget the rest and focus on what matters.

  • If not an Angel Network, then what?

    back black swan shotDavid posted a pretty in-depth piece on the First Angel Network this week. This followed an awesome discussion on TechVibes about angel groups over the weekend. The structure and funding model for First Angel Network were a pretty big surprise to me when I moved to Halifax 3 years ago.

    Frankly it is pretty easy for us to write a post like David’s because the facts really speak for themselves: Millions of dollars from government sources are flowing in to finance what appears to be the exclusive personal gain of two individuals.

    $3000 + 8% is just not acceptable and what makes it even worse is that the 8% does not contribute to the growth or sustainability of the angel group in any way. ACOA and other agencies are the ones paying to maintain the group while the cream is skimmed off the top.

    My guess is that the First Angel Network will tell you that their model is normal and that it is on par with what is happening elsewhere. Simply put: it isn’t. It is artificially sustained, it is egregious and the model needs to be wiped out.

    Shortly after David’s post went live I had a call with one of the most active angel investors in Atlantic Canada. He’s someone I admire and who always seems to be a step or two ahead of my own thinking. When he speaks I try to listen (which means I have to stop talking. . .).

    He doesn’t have much love for a model which skims off the top either, but he’s pragmatic too.

    His question to me was: If not First Angel Network, then how do we keep money moving?

    Angel groups are not an easy thing: There are large groups of willing but relatively unsophisticated investors out there. They have to be marketed to, rounded up, fed a decent meal (usually) and encouraged to focus while a startup pitches to them for an hour or so total. Not easy and it certainly doesn’t have obvious economics for the organizer. It is a tough model no matter which way you slice it. The question is valid and it is something we need to think about a lot.

    The world of tech startups is, or should be at least, different in many ways however. I believe it HAS to be different.

    Sophisticated tech angel investors are accessible and they are ready to do deals almost anywhere. Value-add investors will, by definition, be accessible to the network and available to look at deals. We have a significant opportunity here in Atlantic Canada as well because we have some of the best angels in the country living and working here.

    The landscape is changing for seed investing in tech and I think we need to find new models which make more sense for a typical startup today.

    1. There are many individuals investing regularly in extremely early stage opportunities in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia
    2. There is far more information available to entrepreneurs about financing structures and models than there ever has been before
    3. 10s of Thousands of investors are accesible via AngelList and other sources
    4. The ecosystem is larger than just these few provinces– we are easily connected in to what is happening in other communities.
    5. Legal and other fees should be minimal. Startups should be able to get a round closed for $5k with a max of $10 for a complicated and priced round.
    6. Early stage capital IS flowing in this part of the country from more formal funds such as OMERS, Rho, Real, Version One Ventures and others.
    7. There is a new fund coming online here which will be leading deals and syndicating with outside investors.

    Alternatives will emerge once there is a void to fill and I believe that capital will still flow to great opportunities, while we may have to watch some less awesome ones whither.

    There is a loose syndicate of angels emerging in this part of the country and from what I have seen they are all extremely high quality. It is a group made up of exited founders, successful investors and quality operators. THAT is who should be seeing deals and they do far more than 4 deals a year– dozens are getting done.

    In the end the challenge we have is not simply to tear down the old. The challenge is to take responsibility for building something that matters in the future and that will create more startups through a better model. I believe that First Angel Network’s model needs to change to become less predatory and more focused on creating value in the ecosystem, otherwise we need a new alternative to replace it.

    That is our job here and that is what will really make a difference.

    Right now we have the beginnings of an alternative:

    These are all founder-friendly and accessible routes to getting access to early stage capital. None of them take 8%.

    It’s not perfect, but we will get there.

  • The things an entrepreneur will never tell you

    We always glorify the struggle of the entrepreneur. Late nights, poor diet and little contact with friends. It’s cliche because it is real but we gloss over just how big of a toll it really takes.

    Last week I was having a drink with a recently exited entrepreneur. His last exit was a biggie at $700m+. It seemed to be amazingly well executed from the outside but as we dug in to his story over a few hours I was amazed at how much I could relate to all the ups and downs and how tenuous his hold on success was the entire time.

    Here are my top things that a young (first to fifth time) entrepreneur never tells you when they are in the thick of it, and they are the things you will never understand until you are there. Not everyone deals with each of these things, but the more I talk about it openly the more strongly I feel that it is the norm, not the exception.

    The focus is debilitating

    “He/She is focused!”, “Man, they are hustling!” — you see an someone in action, executing rapidly and firing on all cylinders. You feel like you go to sleep and when you wake up the entrepreneur has already taken it to the next level. How do they do it?

    When you start operating and you can feel the business working you get overtaken by a myopic focus that drives you from one thing to the next. You can see everything in the path in front of you: Obstacles, opportunities and a sense of momentum. To maintain such intense focus though you have to take your focus off other things, and everyone has to choose. Health, friends, family, hobbies. Nobody de-prioritizes any of these things but the problem is you don’t realize which decisions you have made until they are well behind you.

    Entrepreneurs can end up wracked with guilt and wishing they had done things differently.

    The focus is what gives you the highest highs, but drags you in to the lowest lows. Every win seems gigantic and every loss feels equally consequential and that is because of that myopic focus– you only see a few things in front of you and it takes a lot of maturity to be able to focus on the longer term.

     

    The lows are real

    No matter how many highs you get, most entrepreneurs feel some incredibly low times. Almost universally we put on a very positive public face and you would rarely know, but the more time you spend with fellow entrepreneurs after they have left their latest startup, they are more open about talking about those dark days.

    For some of us it makes it feel impossible to get out of bed, sometimes you just can’t bear another meeting. Some founders get angry and lash out, others just hit the bottle way harder than they want you to know.

    These dark periods can last an afternoon or they can last a week. They are only multiplied by the unshakeable focus I talked about above. The focus narrows even more and an obsession with certain metrics or ways out of the trough can develop.

    A manic nature develops and you start to seek the next high. You come out of the low with a focus on something that you know will give you the high you need and you drive towards it harder than most normal people would.

     

    You feel alone and you are alone

    I think a big reason founders move to San Francisco or the Bay Area is because you can at least find hundreds of thousands of like minded people. You feel just a little less alone while you are single handedly taking on the world.

    You learn quickly that you can’t take your problems home because one day you are up and one day you are down, or you might be both on the same day. It doesn’t feel fair to put that on your partner, and if you did they would eventually get tired of it after years of constant ups and downs.

    You toughen up and you bottle it up. You are afraid to really talk about things because you can’t afford to open the bottle– it might knock off your focus and set your company back. That’s a no-no.

    The best investors in the world know that entrepreneurs have this loneliness and they take time to give you a safe space to vent. Almost nobody else can give you this safe space and it takes a lot of work on both sides to develop a level of trust that allows it.

     

    Failure isn’t an option

    Failure is OK. We all know that. It’s a powerful learning tool and it is a required piece of the long term success of an entrepreneur.

    Holy shit it is scary though.

    You are paying salaries, the people you are paying have families and they rely on you. Your investors backed you for a lot of reasons, but you feel like you have to deliver for them.

    Your customers are relying on you.

    You WANT to succeed this time, you don’t want to have to go through another cycle looking for a success.

    It feels overwhelming and it weighs on you. We try to relax and blow off steam, but the feeling that it’s all on you doesn’t go away.


     

    Nobody tells you it is going to be easy, but I think a few of us are surprised by just how much of a toll building a startup can take. Maybe it is hard because it was just never meant to be easy? Who knows.

    Keep at it.

  • The companies I should have paid more

    Building a startup is hard and managing ops is really hard. Devops are hard and expensive.
    Luckily these days there are some amazing companies making it way easier to build the startup of your dreams. Frankly, I don’t think they are getting paid nearly enough while some are getting paid way too much.

    What apps are a key part of your day-to-day and which could you live without? 

    Screen Shot 2013-01-29 at 1.18.04 PMGitHub Paid: $50/month. Should be: $500/month
    GitHub is the lifeblood of our dev team. Everything lives in it and it has allowed us to avoid hiring devops for years. You can hack it, glue it and spew it all over the place. All the while it is secure and reliable, almost never letting us down. It has a ton of “good enough” features like Issues and the Wiki and they are “great” because they integrate right in to the most important parts of GitHub.

    I want this company to live a long and healthy life. May they never be acquired and may they reign for all time.

    HipChat Paid: $2/person/month. Should be: $150/month all-in
    Screen Shot 2013-01-29 at 1.18.44 PMWe have a love/hate relationship with HipChat. We wrote our own robot which connects GitHub in to Hipchat and that is useful for managing a big chunk of our dev process. Hipchat also does a great job of maintaining conversation history, so we can find almost anything we need to in those “what was that thing?” moments.

    Hipchat does however have a horrible Adobe AIR desktop client and one of the worst mobile clients I have ever seen for chat. HipChat on the iPhone has no sense of message status. It tells you “you have a new message!” but then you have to, literally, hunt every chat room and look for a new message. It is also extremely slow to load. We call this “Hipchat anxiety” when we are out of the office. If they can fix these issues then it would be a huge positive for HipChat users. The reason I should have paid HipChat more is because it is clearly useful but they also clearly need the money in order to improve the product.
    download

    Google AppsPaid: $50/user/year. Should be: $150/user/year
    I cannot overstate how awesome it is to have Email, Calendar and Docs out of the box for every new employee. Rock solid service and the apps are always improving. It saves having to buy a MS Office license for every new hire and it has collaboration/sharing baked in. Google apps I love you and I will never hurt you.

    Skype –  Paid: nothing. Should be: $30/user/year
    Skype has been free for Skype-to-Skype for so long that I think Governments would be ousted if they tried to charge for the basic service, but wow we used a lot of Skype calls in the early days. Skype video chat is still the best, even if Google Hangouts are getting better, and it’s very reliable.

    TrelloPaid: I don’t think we do. Should be: Something more than $0

    Trello polarizes. Some love it, some hate it. We clearly love it because we use it to prioritize anything and everything. We should be paying something.

     

    Things we paid too much for:

    Some apps are just too expensive for startups and really aren’t worth even doing the free trial.

    My cellphone. Paid: $60 to $600/month. Should be: $60/month.

    A cellphone bill strikes fear in to a startup’s heart. You make a few trips out of the country and you are greeted with a gigantic roaming bill when you get back. You aren’t the bankers and the lawyers that the phone company is targetting with these crazy roaming rates but you still have to run your business and you need to be able to communicate while you are on the road. I wish I could have just paid a consistent amount that would have let me plan for cellphone expenses.

    Box.com. Paid $15/user/month (and tricked in to a 1-year contract). Should be: $10/user/month with no contract.
    Box does this thing where when you sign up for a paid plan they have you click a box that says “I agree to the terms of service”. When you go and look at that terms of service it commits you to a 1-year contract. It really is absurd. Other contract-based SaaS providers are much more transparent about contracts. Dropbox was a cheap alternative that we used even though we were paying for Box.

    Webex/Gotomeeting. Paid: didn’t. Should be: cheap.
    Even if you are a co-browsing startup you need screensharing occasionally believe it or not. We avoided using it mostly but when we did need it there were much better and cheaper options than Webex or Goto.

     

  • Less boardrooms, more dinner tables.

    People have become really good at pitching. The art has turned in to a bit of a science and if you do ever find yourself in front of a room of people it is par for the course for you to “nail it”. The pitch, it seems, is dead media.

    It’s time to stop obsessing with your pitch and start building relationships.

    If you are going to raise financing for your new product then you need to learn what it means to build relationships.

    tumblr_ldfuxecoUp1qbbu2w

    We started Founders and Funders on the basis that you would never want to accept investment from someone you couldn’t eat a meal with. What better way to find out than to eat a meal with them? It works incredibly well.

    You need to find ways to end up at more dinner tables and in less boardrooms.

    Also: Eat with your mouth closed ya filthy animal.

    Funny story. When I was raising an angel round for my latest company I met a fairly prominent investor for lunch. I ordered a $15 sandwich combo. He got two doubles of Grey Goose, the Rib Eye, and a glass of wine. Then dessert! The shithead then stuck me with the bill! I kid you not. He then got in his car and drove off, I contemplated calling in the DUI. The hell if I was going to let him invest in my company. It was worth the $120 it took to figure it out.

    I tell every entrepreneur that story, and I name names!

    Then there was the time I met with Steve Anderson at a crowded bar. You should consider an invitation to meet an investor at a bar or restaurant a golden ticket. Steve came in, he was starving. I was a bit nervous so I didn’t eat much but we shared some appetizers. He was cool as shit and I knew I wanted him in my round before that meeting was over. Having a coffee and being forced to sit in a corner of a busy bar helps you get almost every “is this guy/girl legit? can I talk to him/her without needing to watch myself?” sort of stuff out of the way.

    I met another investor at a Yogurt shop (he gave a fake name and told them my name was Mike). Another one in a Tiki bar and another in a co-working space.

    Get out of the boardroom. Loosen up. Your pitch sucks but your product is cool, and you are even cooler.

  • The Upside Foundation – Give back a little while you are busy taking over the world

    One thing that has really been exciting for me in the last 3 months has been the Salesforce Foundation. When Marc Benioff founded Salesforce he committed 1 percent of stock, 1 percent of employee time and 1 percent of licenses to charity. It’s an incredibly small amount of equity and resources but it has had an amazing impact. Google and others have copied it and it has become a widely used model.

    I wish I had done the same thing with my most recent startup. I could have benefitted a charity I am passionate about with very little burden to me or my investors. It’s powerful but it is hard to do. Legal structures, convincing co-founders, convincing investors and then there is all the overhead and work of setting up a foundation and managing it.

    The Upside Foundation is launching to make that easier. They are creating a foundation structure which you give options to which convert on an exit and The Upside Foundation then donates the proceeds to charity.

    The model is simple and powerful – early-stage companies donate stock options to the Upside Foundation, convertible at exit into a small portion of their equity. When a liquidity event occurs, the Upside Foundation sells its options and donates the proceeds to charities in Canada.

    The Upside Foundation board is full of some of the best investors and entreprenurs in Canada, including  Rob Antoniades (ON), Mark Skapinker (ON), Mark Macleod (PQ), Gerry Pond (NB) and Ben Zifkin (ON).

    I’m excited. Let’s start giving back while we build amazing companies right here in Canada.

  • Why The Idea is Bigger Than Everything

    I was doing some thinking a few weeks ago about why I am a founder. Everyone has different reasons they look to in order to get through the long grind of being a founder. It’s tough and very thankless, so you need to find the tangible reasons that you can look to both to measure progress and to remind yourself that you are making progress on all fronts.

    Those reasons are all important ones, but they pale in comparison to what drives you to go beyond simply being a founder to being an obsessed, irrational and irrepressible builder: The Idea.

    When it comes to building a lasting company The Idea is more than just a problem you’ve identified. The idea is some new insight in to the world. When you have an idea then you get a lot of things for free along with it:

    • Vision
    • Strategy
    • Product concept

    The entire business will continue to evolve, but truly great ideas are unshaken through constant change. Having an idea that is worthy of spawning a startup is a standard that you should hold yourself to. You’ll know the big one when it comes.

    There are things that come up along the way that make you think you’ve had a big idea and those are the reasons that so many startups get started but lose steam quickly: you find a simple problem, you have an idea for a feature but mistake it for a product, or you find a “vision” which is really just a statement.

    These things do not last, but ideas do. An idea should be novel, unexpected and impossibly big.

    • Reddit wanted to create a front page for the internet
    • Salesforce wanted to make enterprise software as easy to use and buy as Amazon.com and Ebay.com
    • Google wanted to make search useful (and late went on to aspire to organize the world’s information)
    • Elon Musk thought we should drive in electric cars and fly to space one day.
    These are companies who show us the future and promise to take us there. We use them, buy from them and care about them because they aspire to a big idea and when the stumble along the way it makes it far easier for us to be patient with them.
    Mine? At GoInstant we thought the web should be a multi-player experience.
    What’s your big idea?
  • Why I’m a Founder

    Dave says we can’t all be founders.

    He’s probably right. At some point though, I decided that I wanted to be a founder. Lately I’ve been thinking about why it has been so important to me over the last 10+ years to keep at it, even when it didn’t make a lot of sense.

    A lot of different things have driven me to be a founder, I’ll try to be as honest about them as I can.

    A need for control: Don’t get me wrong on this one. I don’t need to control others. I think you could ask any of my current co-founders and they would tell you that I don’t need to control, I just need results. What I do need control over however is my own life. Every morning I wake up that I am ploughing my own path I am happy and ready to take on the day. The moment I sense I have lost that control I am anxious and ineffective.

    A desire to make a lasting difference: There are few things I can do to make a difference, but I feel strongly that providing awesome opportunities for other people to fulfill their own dreams can make a huge difference. I want nothing more than for those who come to work in my startups to see it as a place they can achieve their dreams. Watching people buy homes, raise families and pursue their own passions is probably the most rewarding result of all the work you pour in to your startup.

    Watching people grow: The first feeling of failure when a startup is going sideways is always the sense that you are letting these people down. Startups are demanding and gruelling for everyone. It’s inspiring when these early employees suffer through long hours and low wages with you, but it is the never ending belief that you can make their lives truly better in the end that drives you to keep pushing and often asking for more when you know they have little to give.

    When a startup is going well you get to give people new opportunities and the great thing about people is that they seem to thrive in new situations. Hard problem? Tough decision? If you’ve hired the right people then you never think twice about letting them dive in to the thick of it.

    Working with the best: Simply put: I never have to work with anyone other than those who I think are the smartest, most honest, diligent and incredible people I could meet. Every single one of them amazes me in some way every day and I am a better person because of the example they set.

    Constant learning: There are brilliant people everywhere in the startup world. I think they are more varied, interesting and available than any other community I have been a part of. I love it. I leave every coffee meeting, late night drinks and impromptu meetup feeling like I have learned something new. I love that feeling and I love being a part of a community that provides it.

    Never knowing what’s next: I have no idea what my future holds. I really don’t. I know I am married to a woman I love dearly and who loves me back. I know I have a family I love and can rely on. Those are just about my only constants. Some people call it “instability”, but the founders I know thrive on it. You aren’t going in to the darkness, you are hurtling towards some future you have dreamt up on your own and which you will achieve for yourself, no matter what. Whatever that might be.

     

    We can’t all be founders, but what drives YOU to break out and become one?

  • Canadian VCs are being cut loose, and that’s a good thing

    Mark MacLeod just wrote a post about Canadian VC that cuts to the chase

    If there are any clouds on the horizon, they relate to the disappearance of the US / Canadian border when it comes to VC. When I first entered the startup World, you had no choice but to raise seed and series A in Canada. Only then could you tap the US funding markets. That’s no longer the case.

    [ . . . ]

    There is a perception (rightly or wrongly) that US investors are better than Canadian ones. And that given the choice, founders would raise in the US. Whether this is true or not is not the point. It’s the perception and with the borders coming down it represents a real risk to Canadian investors.

    Mark did it in the nicest possible way, so a lot of people may not have noticed that he just condemned the entire Canadian VC model. It was something I didn’t even have the guts to do lately, so I was surprised to see Mark call the spade a Spade and get on with the conversation.

    The border is gone and the game has changed. Mark argues that Canadian VCs need to pay up more, build their brands and build their networks. That’s a great start.

    Canadian entrepreneurs have been told for years to step up and build global companies. It was hard and confusing to hear at first, but I think we’ve managed to do it. Whether it is Tobi in Ottawa, Kirk in TorontoRyan in Vancouver, Oleg in Toronto, Mike in Toronto, Kenshi Wilkins and Eric in Vancouver, Yona in Montreal, Temo in Montreal etc etc etc [I’ve missed so many here — more to come on David’s Hot Shit List] — I would argue that Canada is producing more world-class entrepreneurs more quickly than ever before.

    We’ve spent the last 10 years being told we weren’t bold enough and need to think bigger. The argument has shifted and our startups now know what it means to be world class and they are doing it.

    It’s time for the Canadian VCs to step up and do the same.

    It doesn’t take nearly as much to get a US based VC to take a look at a Canadian deal anymore. If they have never done a deal in Canada before they usually have a friend who is just a call away who has and it can be demystified pretty quickly. The legal headaches are gone as well.

    If you are a VC in Canada, focused on the Canadian market, then you have far more competition for deals now than you did even a few years ago and the job is more thankless than it has ever been.

    So here’s the challenge for the the new players in Canada. Rho, Celtic, OMERS, iNoviaRelay, Golden, Klass, Wertz, Round13, etc…

    Entrepreneurs are going to start telling a story about under-paying, small thinking and isolated VCs. As US VCs roll off the redeyes in to Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto, Montreal, Halifax and elsewhere it should be you who is bringing them to town to see great deals which are priced right and which are built to succeed from right here in Canada.

    The challenge is that you, like the entrepreneurs you fund, now have to be world class. That probably means being on a plane more often and pulling the trigger on deals within days, not months.

    Nobody should start a VC fund in Canada today unless they want to work as hard or harder than any startup founder they will fund.  It is no longer a job for ex-bankers and management consulting dropouts. The job is hard, mostly thankless, and more competitive than ever.

    That’s why I love this shakeout we have undergone and the one that is continuing today. VC in Canada had to go through the wringer so that we could end up with a handful of the best and most capable operators who can help springboard Canada further on to the world stage. We aren’t going to do it through myopic provincial funds, big corporate funds or economic development agencies.

    It’s going to happen through hungry hustler GPs who have something to prove and only a little time to do it in.

    Canadian VCs need to be startups themselves, because in the end only Startups can save venture capital in Canada.

  • Canada’s Next Five Years

    1997-2012: Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.

    2012-2020: Optimism, Opportunity, Execution.

    I’ve been bullish for a while now, it’s no secret. It was 5 years ago that I was writing off VC in Canada and explaining how startups needed to step up to create an environment to bring them back.

    And like a bowl of Sea Monkeys, the VCs have emerged from stasis.

    Do you realize that I can’t even conjure up a single VC financing in Canada in 2008.

    This week OMERs stepped up in a big way with a $20million financing for HootSuite. This, along with the recent $30 million (debt) financing of Halifax based Unique Solutions, represent some of the first real, and stable, “acceleration capital” that we have seen in Canada.

    Five years of uncertainty about startups in Canada. Uncertainty about whether we could really start them. Uncertainty about whether we could really build them. Uncertainty about whether we could really scale them.

    5+ years that I am happy to say good riddance to.

    The last 5 years we have focused on:

    • Seed stage financing
    • Removing section 116 from the tax code
    • Waiting for shitty VCs to go away
    • Welcoming good VCs on to the scene
    • Getting rid of any idea of building a startup “for the Canadian market”
    • Making “Startup” an understood thing
    • Telling good news stories when they came along

    When I wrote a the post about 2011 being a big year I was focused on 2012 as the next step. What I realize now is that we aren’t just living year-to-year like we used to, the startup community in Canada now needs to start thinking in larger timeframes, with bigger goals and a far more ambitious strategy.

    This is the time to double down.

    I believe strongly that the values, infrastructure and growth of Silicon Valley are becoming better understood and slowly commoditized. Our challenge is not to try to recreate Silicon Valley, but to take the elements of what make it good and to apply it in our own communities. We are getting much closer to that.

    A half-decade is a long time to think about, especially for entrepreneurs. Here’s what I think we need to think about that we haven’t done much about in the last 5 years. What do you think we need to focus on for the next 5 years?

    Education

    Children need quality education in the fundamentals of the Web. Right now we have an education system which tried to teach students about computers but almost completely neglects the Web. A shift to Web-oriented education would mean:

    • Understanding the role of many devices (computers, tablets, phones, etc) in education
    • Web-infused curriculum in all topics. Such as: Web-focused research skills in science courses. Social Media in Language Arts. Etc.
    • Programming skills which are introduced early on and are a required component of curriculum.

    A focus on education should imply the participation of students in the startup community. We need to find ways to include younger and younger would-be entrepreneurs the web startup community.

    Community as the framework

    There are a lot of efforts underway to “professionalize” the management of the startup community in Canada. Watch out for people who claim to know what is best for the Canadian startup community but who haven’t felt the need to immerse themselves in it by being a part of it. The reason that Canada has managed to standup a respected and vibrant startup community is largely because the effort has been decentralized and grassroots. It has not been because of centralized programs or PR focused exercises.

    We need to maintain this focus because developing a strong social network of individuals who are able to contribute to and support the development of Canadian startups is critical. It’s why I like the C100Startup FestivalGrow Conference, CIX and others. They are efforts that have come from people who are entrepreneurs themselves and who understand that the health of the community is critical.

    Tighter Silicon Valley links

    The vast majority of startup hub cities in Canada are within a short flight of San Francisco. We need to take advantage of that link and make exposure in Silicon Valley an expected thing for Canadian Startups. This is easier than ever and it is getting easier. We need more Debbie.

    Policy

    Web Startups are not yet on the radar of policy makers. This has resulted in disjointed policy development which has sometimes harmed startups who develop and compete globally. I believe that the current government has actually made some changes such as the changes to Section 116 of the tax code. Startups benefit from very specific parts of the legislative and tax codes and we must continue to seek as many advantages from these as possible. I mentioned Education above but policy influence also needs to extend to Immigration, R&D programs, procurement and anything else that can be used to give startups in Canada an advantage.

     Grow like hell and don’t stop

    The final thing we need to do is to make even bolder moves. We have our feet under us and now it is time to double down again and again and again. Rather than being the companies who are getting picked off for $20million here and $50million there we need to find opportunities that let Canadian startups become the acquirer and growth engine, rather than the other way around. Hootsuite is a start, but we need to chalk up a few more before the process will become well understood in Canada.

     

    Welcome to the next 5 years.