Month: April 2011

  • Our newest sponsor: VMFarms


    AttributionShare Alike Some rights reserved by Arthur40A

    It was at StartupDrinks or the StartupNorth Meetup when I was talking with Christopher and Hany at VMFarms about our hosting woes. StartupNorth.ca had been offline for about 24 hours, and we were in the dark as our previous hosting provider was trying to recover from a disk failure. Now we don’t have particularly complex hosting requirements, but one of the requirements is uptime. We’d like our services to be available to entrepreneurs 24x7x365. Mind you we’re not willing to pay for 99.999% uptime (learn more about high availability). I would have been ecstatic with “three nines” aka 99.9% or 8.76 hours of downtime per year. But we had failed to meet that requirement at we were approaching 99.5% uptime and without a foreseeable solution we could hit “two nines” (99% uptime) if something wasn’t done by us or the hosting provider.

    We have been very lucky. We had been able to host StartupNorth.ca on a shared hosting solution that allows us to operate our WordPress installation, StartupNorth.ca, a custom Django application, StartupIndex.ca, and some custom development (stay tuned) built in PHP5 + MySQL + Apache2 for $20/month. Cheap if you compare it to what we could be paying. It worked for a long time but I was in the dark and I couldn’t see a light indicating there would be a path to salvation.

    I had met Christopher and Hany a few months before. I personally love the business. In fact, I think I pitch Scott Pelton (@spelton) a similar idea back in the summer of 2010. With Christopher and Hany there is a core team of experienced developer operations and network operations professionals that have cut their chops deploying and supporting high availability leading edge web applications at Avid Life Media (PHP, Rails, Django, etc.). At StartupNorth, we are big proponents of supporting our local ecosystem. We use:

    There was no reason other than cost that we should have our server applications hosted with a non-local provider.

    I approached Christopher and Hany with a proposition. The should sponsor StartupNorth, the sponsorship is an in-kind sponsorship. They provide hosting and support on their infrastructure. We add their logo to StartupNorth web site and page footers, plus we give them the opportunity to write a few posts. The posts aren’t meant to be marketing fluff. I’ve ask the VM Farms team to talk about their real-world experiences including:

    • their experience using different cloud services;
    • network architecture and application hosting for advanced web & mobile applications (think application server, MongoDB or Hadoop clusters plus relational datastores);
    • when/how startups should evaluate the different performance vs cost trade-offs in advanced applications (there’s nothing wrong with choosing AWS but when should you look for alternatives)

    We are incredibly picky about our sponsors. We are even more picky about the posts and authors we ask to join us. We take our reputation and the commentary we provide about the Canadian startup ecosystem very seriously. We’re hoping that we can help educate entrepreneurs about advanced network infrastructure decisions and the impact these decisions can have on costs, performance and growth. And with the team at VMFarms, we have some partners that are experienced and capable of providing a unique 3rd party view of AWS, Rackspace, GoGrid, Azure, Linode, etc. and traditional hosting environments.

    We’ve been on VMFarms for about 30 days now. We have had 2 outages in those 30 days. Both outages have been my fault. Hany and Christopher have been on the ball and responsive to help me diagnose, identify and fix the issues.

    1. Upgrading WordPress 3.1 to 3.1.1 – the Unix user permissions and file access settings I configured on the web directory do not allow the FTP user to write to the web directory. WordPress automatic upgrade requires an FTP user (though we connect using FTP-SSL). I ssh’d to the server, wget the update and “tar -xvzf” to the wordpress directory. This overwrote the .htaccess file and broke the Apache rewrite rules. Resolution time: approximately 15 minutes (because I insisted on doing it myself).
    2. StartupNorth.ca unavailable on April 19, 2011 – turns out we let our DNS registration expire due to an expired credit card. It was identified by 2 users (thank you William and Scott (@scotthom). Hany debugged in about 15 seconds and it required Jevon (@jevon) to renew the DNS registration.

    The team at VMFarms have been fantastic. They are helping StartupNorth immensely. I’m really looking forward to some additional discussion about developer operations in startups (should be interesting given my network infrastructure does not yet include VMFarms – we’re github, Heroku and AWS EC2 + S3).  I’m wondering what John Philip Green (@johnphilipgreen) uses at CommunityLend, Pete Forde (@peteforde) at BuzzData, Daniel Debow (@ddebow) at Rypple, David Ossip (@dossip) at Dayforce, Chris Sukornyk (@sukornyk) uses at Chango, and Mike McDerment (@MikeMcDerment) at FreshBooks use to host their different application layers.

  • ExtremeU 2011

    Extreme Venture Partners

    Our friends over at Extreme Venture Partners have announced the recruitment for the Summer 2011 Cohort of the Extreme University. We written about the past programs:

    The program has historically taken entrepreneurs that need to develop and grow. It has provided them with funding, space, education, access to some of the best entrepreneurs, marketers, business developers and engineers around. While the timeline for success has been different, the companies like Visibli, Uken Games, and Locationary have grown into 3 very strong, very hot Toronto based startups.

    The 2011 Program has been updated based on the learnings from the past 2 years. Accepted entrepreneurs get:

    • Seed capital
    • Mentorship
    • Collaborative office space and shared resources
    • Shared Expertise
    • Network and Connections

    We can argue about if this is fair market value or not, when compared to other seed programs. The Extreme Ventures team is revamping the details of the program. The changes take one of the best programs available and make it even more compelling for eager, resourceful entrepreneurs. It will really redefine incubator programs.

    Why do I say that? Well I spent the first 3 months of development at Influitive living in the XtremeLabs space with the 2009 & 2010 cohorts. I chose to bring my startup and cofounders into this environment because it is the best in Toronto. There is an energy, a vibe of entrepreneurship, community, support and shared pain. There are world-class people like Fred Wilson that visit at the invitation of your office mates (thank you William). XtremeLabs and Extreme VP are launching world-class efforts like Hatch Labs with IAC will continue to bring the best in the world through the space. It is a great environment with the best people I have worked with anywhere – looking at you Farhan Thawar (@fnthawar) and Rick Segal (@ricksegal). All entrepreneurs can benefit from just being in the environment.

    Who are they looking for?

    We fund technology-oriented companies, with a focus on web or mobile-based software, but we are open minded to different ideas. We are looking for smart and fast-moving teams to participate. Typically all members of the two-four person teams will have strong technical abilities. We are looking for founders who have a unique understanding of a real customer problem and an innovative idea for solving that problem.

    If you’re a startup looking for my personal favorite shared space and program you should consider applying to ExtremeU.

     

  • Seed Funding – Some New Considerations

    Seed Funding
    AttributionNoncommercialNo Derivative Works Some rights reserved Photo by Pictoscribe

    I started writing this post while working on my presentation for Enterprise Toronto‘s Small Business Forum 2010 on raising capital for high growth businesses. I’m by no means an expert at this topic, but there are a lot of basics that entrepreneurs and growth businesses can learn about both the type of capital and when to raise it. But Manu Kumar‘s (LinkedIn) must-read post (and the comments) about his Thoughts on Convertible Debt got me to thinking I would publish my list of resources. And Adeo Ressi‘s (@adeoressi) thoughts on Year of the Startup Default includes implications for entrepreneurs raising a lot of debt, because if Series A funding is more difficult to find than getting traditional bank loans or other sources of capital become more difficult with a large, even capped, debt load. There are a lot implications for entrepreneurs.

    The starting point for my now almost 6 month old talk is the fantastic article by Bernard Lunn on Read-Write Web, The Capital-Raising Ladder, which defines the different types of capital that is available to startup companies and founders. The “ladder” concept is key in the article. Entrepreneurs generally have to start at the bottom of the ladder and work their way up each “rung”. Certain entrepreneurs can skip some of the rungs on the ladder particularly if they have had success in the past, i.e., it’s way easier for someone that has built a successful publicly traded company to raise angel or VC money than a student first out of school, but since much of this is a meritocracy it is easy for young entrepreneurs to demonstrate their ability to build successful companies and raise additional capital.

    The implications of Manu Kumar’s post and Adeo Ressi’s are about the prevalence of startups raising convertible debt with angel investors because it is en vogue. Nivi (@venturehacks) has provided some of the best advice on founder fundraising at Venture Hacks and some good analysis of the impact and benefits of debt for entrepreneurs in his comments:

    “Notes were good technology a few years ago but now there are better technologies like Series Seed that have many of the benefits of debt (speed, simplicity, less negotiation). And debt is pretty complicated when you really look at it. I’m guessing we’ll be back to equity in a couple years, for the better. But Series Seed and other equity docs need to be tested a bit more too.

    2. You can work around this in two ways. The company can’t pay back the debt and it converts to equity at maturity. I always include these in debt agreements.” – Babak Nivi comment on Thoughts on Convertible Debt

    The goal here is for entrepreneurs to have access to information to make informed decisions. I hadn’t thought about the impact that the potential debt load might have on Influitive’s ability to raise loans vs financing in the future.

    I’m interested in the thoughts from Boris Wertz (@bwertz), Roger Chabra (@rogerchabra), Scott Pelton (@spelton), Chris Arsenault (@chrisarsenault), Mark MacLeod (@startupcfo), Craig Netterfield (@cnetterfield), Jordan Banks (@Jordan_Banks), Ben Yoskovitz (@byosko), John Philip Green (@johnphilipgreen) and others.

    • What are the unique implications for Canadian founders in that are unique to the considerations for convertible debt?
    • What are you thoughts on convertible debt notes as an investor?

    Resources for Entrepreneurs

    Here’s my short-list of resources around the mechanics of raising money and evaluating the documentation.

  • StartupFestival – Call for Startup Pitches

    International Startup Festival - Call for Startups

    The team behind Startup Festival (which StartupNorth is a Media Sponsor) has started the call for startups looking to pitch and launch at the festival. They are looking for startups in a variety of verticals, at a variety of stages of corporate development, and looking to raise funding or attention for their companies. It’s a great Canadian event that is guarranteed to have local, national and global investors and press attending.

    Apply to Pitch

    Top 5 Reasons to Pitch at Startup Festival

    1. You didn’t get accepted to Launch, TechCrunch Disrupt or Demo
    2. You’ll be attending anyway, might as well get some great PR & exposure with attendees and speakers
    3. StartupFestival is a great bridge between North America and Europe. And you’re considering accelerating your access to European markets
    4. You’re actively raising funding and you want to get in front of the best investors and coaches in North America
    5. You’re funnier than Dave McClure and Will Ferrell should produce a webisode for Funny or Die featuring “Your Startup Life” with Claire Daines having a reoccurring guest starring role

    Apply to Pitch

  • The Paradox of Choice

    Meagphone

    Crowd at AccelerateMTL photo by Chris Arsenault
    Photo by © 2011 Chris Arsenault

    I love what is going on in Montreal.

    It’s nice. It’s concise. It’s clean. There is choice but it’s not overwhelming. It feels like there is a consolidated effort to make Montreal the hub for startups and technology in Quebec. There are other activities and groups but there seems to be a core group of influencers, activities, and events where high tech entrepreneurs can go to find others like them, potential employees, potential investors, etc.

    I look at Ontario and I am concerned. We have what should be the building blocks for a great entrepreneurial soup. And we’ve seen some spectacular successes (Bumptop, Sysomos, Pushlife among others). But there is a lot of noise. Efforts divided between regions.

    Turning up the volume

    Volume goes to 11 by John Watson
    Photo by © John Watson

    I’m not suggesting a “one ring to rule them all” strategy. There are grassroots efforts, there are provincial government efforts, there are local economic development efforts like:

    It leads to the murky waters that are the entrepreneur community and support infrastructure in Ontario. There is no segmentation. There definitely isn’t self-selection. They use similar words to describe their activities: entrepreneurship, startups, technology, media, growth, etc. As entrepreneurs there is a paradox of choice about who to listen to, where to go for advice, support, mentorship and guidance.

    We started StartupNorth as a way to document our experiences finding, using, evaluating other startups in Toronto and across Canada. It was a way to connect with others interested in startups, emerging technologies and business models, and to talk about the things in a context specific to Canada.

    I realize that the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation (MRI) has added to the entities designed to enable entrepreneurs. They are trying to “spread innovation” through out the province via the university commercialization networks.  The  ONE network that has centres in Waterloo, KingstonGuelph, Halton RegionDurham Region, Hamilton, Toronto, St. Catherines, North Bay, Sudbury, Ottawa, Mississauga, London, Markham and Windsor. The program is separate but deeply tied to the collaboration between business and academia.

    • Waterloo = University of Waterloo + Wilfred Laurier University
    • Kingston = Queen’s University + Royal Military College
    • Guelph = University of Guelph
    • Halton Region = Sheridan Institute of Technology & Applied Learning
    • Durham Region = University of Ontario Institute of Technology
    • Hamilton = McMaster University
    • Toronto = University of Toronto +  Ryerson University + OCAD
    • St. Catherines = Brock University
    • Sault St. Marie = Algoma University
    • North Bay = Nipissing University
    • Sudbury = Laurentian University
    • Ottawa = University of Ottawa + Carleton University
    • Mississauga = University of Toronto Mississauga Campus
    • London = University of Western Ontario
    • Markham = York University + University of Toronto Scarborough Campus
    • Windsor = University of Windsor

    It’s interesting that California with an estimated population that is 3.7 times larger [1] than Ontario[2] has less innovation hubs than Ontario (12 in California to 14 in Ontario). (Sure from a per capita GDP calculation, Ontario is higher (Cdn$43,847 vs US$38,956) but it’s probably not entirely a relevant metric unless you’re a politician which I am not).

    Photo by postbear eater of worlds – Some rights reserved CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

    I’m wondering if rather than satisfising constituents with perceiving innovation benefits for votes, that we need to look toward innovation, education and economic growth programs that benefit citizens. I keep wondering what we are missing because of the existing programs and repackaging of programs for Ontarios entrepreneurs. Look at the job creation from a single venture firm, Union Square Ventures has portfolio companies with over 557 open jobs around the globe (128 are in NYC + Brooklyn). This is job creation. It’s focused on creating new positions, in a variety of rolls, that hopefully will attract new talent to the location.

    Everyone loves to hates Toronto

    Let’s all hate Toronto. It’s not uncommon for Canadians to dislike Toronto. But I don’t hear the same disdain for Montreal or Vancouver. But maybe that’s because I don’t live with their large gravity well pulling me closer. I choose to live downtown in Toronto because it’s where I want to be. I understand the lifestyle choices that others make to live elsewhere. There are days when the traffic, the people, the crazy, all get to me, but I love the collision of people, cultures, and ideas (go read Richard Florida for more thoughts on the Creative Class).

    Are we missing an opportunity to raise the profile of Ontario companies because we don’t want to embrace the fact that Toronto is one of the major technology/media hubs? Are we diluting efforts by spreading the love and effort across 16 regions?

  • Surviving The Cash Crunch (Part 1)

    Photo by © 2008 Daniela Hartmann
    Photo by © 2008 Daniela Hartmann

    You are 3-6 months away from running out of cash.  Your current business model & strategy isn’t going to make it happen over that same period.  You are unable to raise a new round.

    This is another classic stage for mid-stage startups I’ve heard nicely referred to as “controlled burn”.  You either need to pivot onto something new or give your current strategy time to break-even, whatever it is you need to do, you don’t have the cash to do it without doing something about costs.  So you need to turn 3 months of money into 12 months of money or more.

    I’m speculating, but the number of start-ups who hit a cash crunch over all-time probably approaches infinity.  Annoyingly though it doesn’t get written about often and there isn’t a lot of useful advice I’ve found.  Having seen this a few times and talked to a many companies with this type of problem, I thought I’d try and touch the topic with some useful tactics.  One key note – all of this needs to be done in advance of running out of cash, not once you have run out of cash.

    Do NOT Raise Too Much Money, Too Early

    My first advice is preventative.  I’ve been part of teams that have raised $0, $80mm and $20mm as the initial round.  So I have some very real world experience with both ends of this argument.

    Photo by Stephen Poff
    Photo by Stephen Poff CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

    There are two problems.  The first is that if you raise a lot of money, your investors expect you to do something with it, not sit on it.  You are expected to get “fat”.  Hire a great mgmt team, hire middle mgmt, hire depth, have project managers, have tons of software firepower, big marketing plans, big markets, etc, etc.  This means that your burn will probably be stupidly high and you’ll probably hit cash flow problems marginally past that of a team that raised much less capital.  It means your cuts are more painful and the “paradigm-shift” is larger.

    On the other side, you eliminate options for handling cash flow issues by raising too much, too early.  Imagine each $5mm increment as chopping off a tier of the investing market for your company.  Somewhere past say $20-$30mm you need to have the financial results to match your valuation to enter into these new “investment markets”.  You can end up pigeon-holed into a tiny corner of the investment world – need lots of money, have a great team/idea, but don’t yet have the results to justify the results…. uh oh.

    This is where founder-killing down-rounds and inside-rounds happen and equity disappears.

    Layoffs

    For most startups, the biggest cost is people.  If you want to control burn, there’s probably no way to get around dealing with this.  So here’s a few ways to actually bring down people cost:

    1. Cross the board pay cuts – CEO goes to $1, mgmt team takes large cuts, staff take smaller cuts.  Keep the team together.  (Usually you talk yourself into this strategy because you have like a half a percent chance at having some big company who you’ve met once buying you)
    2. Big layoff day.
    3. Offer packages, options to furlough or take time off – “anybody want to take 6 months off to travel the world and want to come back to a full paying job?”

    Generally, I’m a fan of cut deep, fast and once.  If you try to be the “nice guy” and retain people for less money, etc – you are screwing everybody.  Many employees will get a new job before your notice period ends and it’ll probably pay more than they made now.   You are not being nice by offering them a chance to stick around at reduced pay.  Others have big enough bank rolls to live without income for a bit and will take time off and deliberate about jobs – e.g. senior mgmt.  For some, layoffs are common territories – for instance accounts and analysts, often the first to go as they are nice to haves, not must haves in a cash conscious company.  Other folks will use this as the impetus to do their own entrepreneurial adventure and will get rich because you laid them off.  So really, don’t get all teary and sad about laying folks off – many will be able to handle it and you aren’t doing them a favour by keeping them around.

    My “nice guy” layoff tactic would look something like this.  Do all your layoffs at once and give a reasonable notice period (4-8 weeks??).  Don’t spend much time deliberating and talking to folks – morale dies quickly and people stop working when waiting for a decision.  Do it and make sure to do it deep enough the first time.  Then, go out and help the people you laid off find new jobs.  Reach out to your vast startup network – for every startup laying off, you can probably find a new one hiring, especially folks with startup experience.  Then, give some time, say 4-6 weeks.  Then and only then, if some folks seem to be in trouble financially and unable to find work – offer them contract work to get them past the hump, a few grand a month, something like that.  Double down in helping them find them new roles.  Ask your VC for help in placing them.

    Partners & Creditors

    Before I write what I am about to write I want to make some things very clear.  Always do honest business and never screw your partners intentionally.  Your name is everything.  When you are starting to get short on cash talk to them and look for options, some will have experienced similar and will be helpful.

    So my first advice is preventative.  When you negotiate every contract, take it from the lens of “what happens if I run out of cash?”.  Can you terminate?  Can you adjust pricing?  Are the terms 30 days or 90 days?  Can they kill my business if I am short on cash?  Don’t bet on a long future and sign-up for 2-3 year deals.  Business flexibility is probably more important than scaling costs downwards off the bat.

    Once you are in the cash crunch situation, here is a golden rule I once heard “Pay your customers, not your creditors”.  I.e. in a world of limited money and limited choice of how to apply it, remember that paying creditors won’t result in your business generating cash,  it will result in your business dying and all your creditors getting $0.  You are helping your creditors by helping yourself (presuming you don’t spend it stupidly).

    The key date to remember when negotiating with any partner is their fiscal year end.  If you are past 90 days due on payments, you have to pay something otherwise your partner is basically forced to write you off as bad debts.  If you pay anything, they can keep it as revenue.  Also remember that if you have global partners that standards of non-payment are very different.  Payables past 90+ days may be more the norm than a “business faux pas” in certain countries.

    No matter what this is going to result in you hating your job for a while.  Negotiating and settling with partners is not fun.  Nor is stringing out payments.  People will not say very nice things to you.

     

    In part 2, I’ll look at customers & pricing, and operating your business once in the cash crunch.

  • StartupWeekend Toronto – Summer Edition

    StartupWeekend is coming back to Toronto this June 3-5. After an excellent kick-off event last September, Toronto is primed to bring it again. If you don’t believe that you can get started building real companies in a weekend then take a closer look. The Toronto community showed its stuff and did some amazing work last time around: TaskAve, RateHub, N20Vuru.

    StartupWeekends are cropping up around the world, the movement is gaining momentum. Only a couple of months back, Zaarly was born at StartupWeekend LA – Zaarly has since raised $1M and was ready for launch at this year’s SXSW. More and more stories like this are emerging as these events gain traction and participants come ready to build. This June’s StartupWeekend is going to be held at the historic Burroughes Building at Queen and Bathurst and will provide an environment to promote true collaboration – not just within the teams but across teams as well.

    We will be working hard at creating an even better environment for all of you to learn, be inspired, and build great things. Just come ready to work hard and have fun. Start getting your pitches ready and watch space for more. Follow us online and via twitter (@startupwkndto) for updates.

    Tickets are on sale now, the first 20 StartupNorth readers to register receive a 20% discount – use the code: STARTUPNORTHSW


  • Pushlife acquired by Google

    Details are still emerging but it sounds like another Toronto company has been acquired by the GOOG. We’ve been hearing that the purchase price is close to $25MM, hopefully that’s Canadian Dollars this week and not US Dollars.

    The Pushlife web is currently down. But you can see 10 employees listed on the Company Page on LinkedIn including CEO and Founder Ray Reddy. Ray (@raymondreddy) hasn’t updated his Twitter since December 2010.

    t1m's Tweet

    This makes Pushlife the 3rd Toronto company acquired by Google (Bumptop and SocialDeck being the other two).

     

     

  • Startup’s Razor

    Here’s is a lesson I (almost) learnt the hard way.

    Back in 2006, I met a talented developer who had built a novelty web telephony product. We caught up for a tea and discussed applications for the technology. One ambitious idea was to create something akin to Yahoo Pipes with the Asterisk open source PBX. Pretty awesome, right?

    With one developer and one designer we got started with a simple proof of concept. Then he broke (and almost lost) his leg snowboarding – out of commission for months, the project got dropped. Had he not wrapped his leg around a tree, in retrospect I am fairly certain the project might still have been left in the dust… read on.

    There is a principle known as Occam’s Razor, which has been tabled by many great minds. It goes something like this:

    Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora. – William of Ockham

    Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler. – Albert Einstein

    Keep it simple stupid. – Kelly Johnson

    Fast forward to 2009, along came Twilio, an IP telephony platform exposed as a service via a simple API (it rocks, check it out). Fact: an API is far less complex than building a drag and drop pipes type solution.

    The simplest solution, all else being equal, wins.

    Why? The simplest solution is fastest to implement (aka Minimum Viable Product). The simplest solution addresses the broadest possible set of customer use cases. The simplest solution leaves the most capital to direct into the drivers of growth other than product development.

    Can your product be too simple? Can you cut too much? Sure. That said, I’d bet you need to keep shaving (we did).

     

  • Hunting Elephants

    Recent news of the GoDaddy Elephant Hunt (warning graphic video) offers two lessons for startups. The first is obvious, as CEO your personal brand is inescapably linked to your company. The second is perhaps somewhat less obvious in the cloud of outrage… YOU SHOULD BE HUNTING ELEPHANTS.

    Allow me to explain:

    1. No one will care if you go on a mosquito hunt. If your startup is pursuing a tiny market, no one will notice, no one will invest, and no one will join the hunt.

    2. The elephant hunt will feed a village. Even if your startup is successful, if the market is minuscule you have failed.

    3. An elephant is easier to see than a mosquito. Finding customers for your startup is half the battle.

    4. Elephant hunts are more dangerous. There is nothing quite like the thrill of competing in a dynamic market.

    5. You will love telling the story about the elephant stampede through camp. Even if you don’t end up revolutionizing a market, you’ll learn an industry and build a strong network.

    Are you hunting elephants?

     

    In case you missed the point entirely, this post was about markets not mammals. Species and habitats are essential to a healthy planet. Please don’t go around shooting elephants with artillery for sport, there is nothing sportsmanlike about it. Instead consider making a donation to the World Wildlife Fund and become a partner in conservation.