Category: Resources

  • Introducing the StartupNorth Event Calendar

    We get emails just about everyday asking for a calendar of startup events across Canada. And it is a damn shame for entrepreneurs to miss a chance to meet up just because there is no event calendar. So without further ado, head on over and check it out. Right now, we just have Toronto events listed, but we’ll be adding Calendars for all the other great regions across Canada as soon as possible.

    We are using Google Calendar so people across the country can collaborate on this project. If you already use Google Calendar and would like to occasionally contribute by posting events, contact us and we?ll provide you with this super power.

    Updates: Edmonton is now onboard (thanks to Cam)! Montreal coming soon (thanks to Heri)! And Waterloo too (thanks to Thom)! Note: If you also live in these cities and are interested in contributing, please contact us as well!

    ___________________________

    Mea Culpa. I pulled the image that originally accompanied this post. Why? Well first off, I wasn’t particularly satisfied with it to begin with. While this Calendar Project is something we?ve been thinking about for a while now, the image to accompany the announcement was just something I rushed out this morning. Yes, of course it was just a joke. No, this was not my finest work with Photoshop. For those of you curious what all the hoopla is about, you can find the image posted here.

    My hope is for this Calendar Project to help get more people (men AND women) out to events and as a result working together building great companies. I?d hate for anyone to feel left out. Two of the many things I love about Canada are its inclusiveness and that people call things how they see them. I wouldn?t change either of these things for the world.

    I hope you find the calendar useful. See you at an upcoming event.

    Jonas

  • 7 avoidable capital raising mistakes

    Mark McQueen, the guy behind Wellington Financial is quickly becoming a blog rockstar, and his latest post is no exception.

    Mark deals in the Venture Debt business, a similar product to that of Silicon Valley Bank and a few others. He is the kind of guy you might end up talking to down the road when you need some growth capital. Who knows. All I know is that when I have asked Private Equity guys about Mark and Wellington, they have always gotten a little scrappy, so I take it as a good sign.

    Here is his post, 7 avoidable capital raising mistakes. It is worthwhile advice for anyone pitching to VCs, angels or potential business partners.


    In this first attempt to stick to the script, we?ll address seven of the more obvious mistakes that entrepreneurs make when trying to raise capital (this is not to sound patronizing, but to help make the capital-raising process a success):

    1. False Sense of Urgency

    Imagine the excitement when the email comes in: ?Can I see you tomorrow to discuss a new deal?? As a firm that prides itself in operating in real time, the natural desire is to say ?yes?. Drop everything and see what the fuss is about. Our natural request is for a corporate overview or something similar – gives us a chance to learn about the business prior to the session. Unfortunately, not everyone is as prepared for the request. If you don?t have the powerpoint / business plan ready to share, you shouldn?t be booking meetings for the next day.

    Worse, if you aren?t currently looking to raise capital, there?s no need to try to get on a VC?s dance card for 24 hours from now.

    2. Hurry Up and Wait

    The ugly sister of #1 above. When you book a meeting with a capital provider, you have to assume that they?ll like the story as much as you do. Why else are you pitching the story? Which means they will invariably ask for detailed financial information. Like the financial model that formed the backbone of the powerpoint presentation. Far too often, the response is: it?ll be a couple of weeks. Why the rush for the 1st meeting if the financials weren?t ready?

    We always wonder about that. What will take a couple of weeks? Did you not have a forecast when you presented the business plan? Or are the forecasts not yet sexy enough for sharing?

    The other mistake is the: let?s get the NDA signed up right now. But 10 days sometimes goes by before the first volley of information is sent. Any hint of disorganization is a bad first impression.

    3. ?Not Board Approved?

    Then there are the financial models that ?haven?t yet been approved by the Board?. Having had the meeting, and received the financial forecasts, VCs are often told that the budget they?ve been given hasn?t yet received the sign off of the company?s Board of Directors. But you should still value/analyze the business on the basis that this is the working forecast.

    Which begs the question: if the financial budget that is being shared with would-be capital providers isn?t Board-approved, what is it? Management-approved? Does the Board even know you are talking to potential outside investors? And how does this budget compare to the one that is currently ?Board approved?? Is it better or worse?

    4. The Five Alarm Fire

    Unlike #1 above, this meeting truly is incredibly urgent. The problem is, no one comes clean about just how urgent it is until the meeting is underway.

    Imagine the scenario. Company (or Agent) requests a meeting. It goes well. Good story and strong management. The problem is, they ?need to close? the financing in less than two weeks. Huh? Whatever it is, acquisition, deposit, customer order fulfillment, etc. The timeline is critical. Assuming it is a new story to the firm, and not a follow-on, I can?t think of any institutional firm in the country that can do the primary due diligence, negotiate the deal, draft legals, and cut a cheque in 8 or 10 business days.

    Serious case of lunch bag letdown. Having spent two hours on an interesting meeting, it turns out there is no way to do the deal.

    5. Cell Phone Conference Call Pitch (aka persons of no fixed address)

    This is a personal favourite. The virtual powerpoint presentation. They usually come via a known referral, who is less concerned about you wasting your time than you might be.

    The scheduled one hour pitch comes from someone you?ve never met, and they sound as though they are lying down the entire time. They are relaxed alright, almost too calm. It can be disconcerting.

    As the pitch continues, your mind wanders and you ask yourself – do they even have an office? How do they oversee the staff if they?re always elsewhere? What city are they calling us from right now? And why are they looking for money from us, residents of a foreign country? How do we due dili the deal if there?s no office? Etc.

    just think of how it looks in a police report on television: the assailant had no fixed address (i.e., no job, can?t cover the rent, parents kicked them out of the basement long ago). Has a certain aura to it.

    6. Thanks For Nothing

    It may strike you as hard to believe, but this happens from time to time. A meeting is booked. The story is told. It goes well. Due diligence is done, and a term sheet is issued for a potential financing. Then, radio silence from the person who was looking for the capital. Perhaps they found the money elsewhere. Perhaps they changed their mind. Perhaps an existing investor did the deal instead.

    That is generally just fine by us, as we look at 500 opportunities a year and understand that just as we can?t give every company money, not every company utilize our services.

    But to have gone through the process to size up an opportunity and issue a term sheet, just think of how easy it would be to pen a two sentence email saying: ?thanks, but we are going a different direction?. The VC market is small, and while folks keep confidential business information to themselves, a reputation for rudeness is worth avoiding. It is so easy to say ?thanks but no thanks?.

    7. ?These Forecasts Are Ultra Conservative?

    I?m sure you are surprised that people would use the phrase ?conservative?, particularly at a time when 80% of private companies are missing their forecasts. But, you?d be wrong if you didn?t think it happened every week. At some point during the pitch, someone from the company says ?these forecasts are conservative?. Sometimes you?ll get the ?ultra? modifier as well.

    This is certainly the ?#1 guaranteed to generate a laugh? line in the business. It is almost as good as the follow-up ?I know everyone says their forecasts are conservative, but these really are.? Just like you would never say ?I?m really good in bed? on a first date, just hide the conservative nature of the forecasts for the due diligence period. Some VCs won?t take a second meeting if they hear that line in the first go ?round; they assume, fairly or not, that you?re wet behind the ears.

    If the entire pipleine is already contracted, have the VC figure that out during due dili and say ?wow, are these ever conservative forecasts!? You?ll catch a lot more fish that way.

  • 30 Ideas that need to be Funded

    Paul Graham has published Startup Ideas We?d Like to Fund at YCombinator.

    1. A cure for the disease of which the RIAA is a symptom
    2. Simplified browsing
    3. New news
    4. Outsourced IT
    5. Enterprise software 2.0
    6. More variants of CRM
    7. Something your company needs that doesn?t exist
    8. Dating
    9. Photo/video sharing services
    10. Auctions
    11. Web Office apps
    12. Fix advertising
    13. Online learning
    14. Tools for measurement
    15. Off the shelf security
    16. A form of search that depends on design
    17. New payment methods
    18. The WebOS
    19. Application and/or data hosting
    20. Shopping guides
    21. Finance software for individuals and small businesses
    22. A web-based Excel/database hybrid
    23. More open alternatives to Wikipedia
    24. A buffer against bad customer service
    25. A Craigslist competitor
    26. Better video chat
    27. Hardware/software hybrids
    28. Fixing email overload
    29. Easy site builders for specific markets
    30. Startups for startups

    It?s a great list for entrepreneurs to start thinking about what to build next. The best part is that a number of folks have been building this software in Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal and other places in Canada. Here is my quick feedback about stuff that I can think of that fits the Canadian criteria.

    5. Enterprise software 2.0 ? Jevon has been talking about this for ages.

    6. More variants of CRM ? Dan McGrady is building integrate. Scott Annan and Scott Lake are building MercuryGrove. I love applications that focus on improving customer interactions, increasing the resolution of the interaction, these are products that small businesses drool over because they have an immediate impact on the bottom line.

    9. Photo/video sharing services ? Terry and Jeff at ParkVu are doing some really cool things.

    13. Online learning ? John and Gosia have drawn a line in the sand with LearnHub (my view of their opportunity).

    19. Application and/or data hosting ? Reuven Cohen is working at building some of the tools for Enomaly. While not Canadian, I?m intrigued with 10gen, Joyent, GoGrid, EngineYard and others. I wish there were some additional strong Canadian contenders in this space.

    20. Shopping guides ? Omar Ismail is leading the charge for open shopping reviews at ProductWiki. Candice Factor is working on building OurFaves inside the TorStarDigital network.

    21. Finance software for individuals and small businesses ? Mike McDerment and the kick ass team at FreshBooks are taking a stab at financial management tools for small business. George Favvas is building SmartHippo to enable better mortgage and financial information for consumers.

    22. A web-based Excel/database hybrid ? Avi Bryant and Andrew Catton are building a great tool, DabbleDB

    Kevin Leneway, who apparently is part of my brethren in DPE at Microsoft, has started going through each idea on the list one-by-one. He has decided to address each of the 30 ideas to generate ideas for a startup. It?s a great series of posts.

    Are there other Canadian companies that are solutions to one of the 30 ideas? Share them with us!

  • Dan McGrady: 7 Reasons Why My Social Music Site Never Took Off

    Dan McGrady has been on a roll with some great posts lately, and “7 Reasons Why My Social Music Site Never Took Off” really grabbed my attention yesterday.

    Dan started Contrastream last summer. I liked the site a lot, as I think music discovery is a huge problem that is being approached in the wrong way by the major music sites/stores. The site was well put together and full of potential, but it just didn’t take off.

    This is where, I believe, Dan is making the shift from being someone who cobbled together a website to being an entrepreneur. Instead of hiding the fact that Contrastream didn’t really take off, Dan is making a clean break, reflecting on what he learned and what he did wrong, and he is hitting the ground running with his next startup: IntegrateSales

    Dan’s reasons his site never took off? Read his blog for his full analysis

    • Design Perfection
    • Underestimated the ?Cold Start? problem
    • Market Size vs Business Model
    • Bad launch
    • Competition
    • Motivation
    • Co-founder
    • Derivative Idea
  • 17 Mistakes Start-ups Make

    John Osher discussed What Not To Do: 17 most common mistakes start-ups make and how to avoid them in Entrepreneur Magazine. Each of the mistakes are a topic on their own, for example, I?ve trying to provide examples of high level market and financial analysis. Mistakes 1-8 focus on the market and financial requirements of a startup. Mistakes 9-10 focus on hiring and corporate management. Mistake 11 is about product design and technology. Mistakes 12-17 are about focus and vision. It is a very interesting read for building an appropriate mind-set for entrepreneurs.

    1. Failing to spend enough time researching the business idea to see if it’s viable. "This is really the most important mistake of all. They say 9 [out] of 10 entrepreneurs fail because they’re undercapitalized or have the wrong people. I say 9 [out] of 10 people fail because their original concept is not viable. They want to be in business so much that they often don’t do the work they need to do ahead of time, so everything they do is doomed. They can be very talented, do everything else right, and fail because they have ideas that are flawed."
    2. Miscalculating market size, timing, ease of entry and potential market share. "Most new entrepreneurs get very excited over an idea and don’t look for the truth about how many people will want to buy it. They put together financial projections as part of a presentation to pump up their investors. They say, ‘The market size is 50 million people that could use this product, and if I could only sell to 2 percent of them, I’d be selling a million pieces.’ But 2 percent of a market is a lot. Most products sell way less than 1 percent."
    3. Underestimating financial requirements and timing. "They set their financial requirements based on Mistake 1, and they go ahead and make a commitment to this much office space and this many computers, and hire a vice president of sales, and so on. Before they know it, based on sales projections that were wrong to start with, they have created costs that require those projections to be met. So they run out of money."
    4. Overprojecting sales volume and timing. "They have already miscalculated the size of the market. Now they overproject their portion of it. They often say ‘There are 200 million homes, and I need to sell [to] x number of them.’ When you break it down, though, a much smaller number of those are really sales prospects. That makes it impossible to make their sales projections."
    5. Making cost projections that are too low. "Their cost projections are always too low. Part of the reason is that they project much higher sales. There are also unknown reasons that always come out that usually make costs higher than planned. So on top of everything, their margins are now lower."
    6. Hiring too many people and spending too much on offices and facilities. "Now you have lower sales, higher costs and too much overhead. These are the things that you see every day in companies that fail. And they all grow out of that first mistake: failing to research the size and viability of the opportunity."
    7. Lacking a contingency plan for a shortfall in expectations. "Even if you’re realistic in your estimates to start, there are things that happen when you start a new business. Your sales ideas may be no good; bank rates may go up; there may be a shipping strike. These aren’t the result of poor planning, but they happen. More often than not, entrepreneurs just feel that something will come along when they need it. They don’t have contingency plans for it not working out at the size and time they want."
    8. Bringing in unnecessary partners. "There are certain partners you need. For instance, you often need money, so you’re going to need money partners. But too many times, the guy with the idea takes on all his friends as partners. Many people don’t provide strategic advantages and don’t warrant ownership. But they’re all going to get 25 percent of the company. It’s totally unnecessary, and it’s a mistake. Before people are made partners, they have to earn it."
    9. Hiring for convenience rather than skill requirements. "In my first business or two, I hired relatives. It was easy to do, but in many cases, they were the wrong people [for the job]. And it’s hard to fire people, especially if they’re relatives or friends. More time needs to be spent handpicking people based on skill requirements. You really need super-skilled people who can wear more than one hat. It just bogs you down when you hire people who can’t do the job."
    10. Neglecting to manage the entire company as a whole. "You see this happen all the time. They’ll spend half their time doing something that represents 5 percent of their business. You have to have a view of your whole company. But too often, the person running it loses that view. They get involved in a part, and they don’t manage the whole. Whether I do this product or that product, whether I hire somebody, [I consider] how they [will] fit long term and short term in the big picture. Constantly try to see your big picture."
    11. Accepting that it’s "not possible" too easily rather than finding a way. "I had an engineer who was a very good engineer, but with every toy we developed, he would say, ‘You can’t do it that way.’ I had to be careful not to accept this too easily. I had to look further. If you’re an entrepreneur, you’re going to break new ground. A lot of people are going to say it’s not possible. You can’t accept that too easily. A good entrepreneur is going to find a way."
    12. Focusing too much on sales volume and company size rather than profit. "Too much of your management is often based on volume and size. So many entrepreneurs want to say ‘I have a company that’s this big, with this many people, this many square feet of space, and this much sales.’ It’s too much [emphasis] on how fast and big you can build a business rather than how much profit it can make. Bankers and investors don’t like this. Entrepreneurs are so into creating and building, but they also have to learn to become good [businesspeople]."
    13. Seeking confirmation of your actions rather than seeking the truth. "This often happens: You want to do something, so you talk about it with people who work for you. You talk to [your] family and friends. But you’re only looking for confirmation; you’re not looking for the truth. You’re looking for somebody to tell you you’re right. But the truth always comes out. So we [test] our products, and we listen to what [the testers] say. We give much more value to the truth than to people saying what we’re doing is great."
    14. Lacking simplicity in your vision. "Many entrepreneurs go in too many directions at once and do not execute anything well. Rather than focusing on doing everything right to sell to their biggest markets, they divide the attention of their people and their time, trying to do too many things at [one time]. Then their main product isn’t done properly because they’re doing so many different things. They have an idea and say they’re going to sell it to Wal-Mart. Then they say they’re going to sell to [the] Home Shopping Network. And then the gift market looks good. And so on."
    15. Lacking clarity of your long-term aim and business purpose. "You should have an idea of what your long-term aim is. It doesn’t mean that won’t change, but when you aim an arrow, you have to be aiming at a target. This [concept will] often come up when people a
      sk ‘How do I pick a product?’ The answer depends on what you’re trying to do. If you’re trying to [create] a billion-dollar company with this product, it may not have a chance. But if you’re trying to make a $5 million company, it can work. Or if you’re trying to create a company [in which] family members can be employed, it can work. Clarity of your business purpose is very important [but] is often not really part of the thought process."
    16. Lacking focus and identity. "This was written from the viewpoint of building the company as a valuable entity. The company itself is also a product. Too many companies try to go after too many targets at once and end up with a potpourri rather than a focused business entity with an identity. When you try to make a business, it’s very important to maintain a focus and an identity. Don’t let it become a potpourri, or it loses its power. For instance, you say, ‘We’re already selling to Kmart, so we might as well make a toy because Kmart buys toys.’ If you do that, the company becomes weaker. A company needs to be focused on what it is. Then its power builds from that."
    17. Lacking an exit strategy. "Have an exit plan, and create your business to satisfy that plan. For instance, I am thinking I might run my new business for two years and then get out of it. I think it’s an opportunity to make a tremendous amount of money for two years, but I’m not sure [whether] it’s proprietary enough to stop the competition from getting in. So I’m in with an exit strategy of doing it for two years and then winding down. I won’t commit to long-term leases, and after the first year, we’ll start watching the marketplace very closely and start watching inventories.
  • NYC Seed versus IAF

    Wow, NYC Seed is an interesting fund focused on seed-stage technology companies in NYC. It sounds familiar to the IAF program by the Ontario Centres for Excellence.

    The NYC Seed fund is a joint venture between ITAC, New York City Investment Fund, The New York State Foundation for Science, Technology and Innovation, New York City Economic Development Corporation, and PolyTechnic University. In addition to investing up to $200,000 per startup, the fund aims to give entrepreneurs support via a network of "notable entrepreneurs, technologists and venture capitalists," and plans to help the companies it funds seek series A round funding when they reach that stage?

    The fund currently has $2 million under management.

    The Investment Accelerator Fund (IAF) is similiar, it allows up to $500,000 in the form of convertible debt for early-stage companies.

    Fund Requires
    NYC Seed
    • A team (2+ people) with a compelling idea that makes sense today.
    • Your team should be technically savvy, with members possessing a proven record of completing complex technology projects.
    • We will ask to review a prototype of your product.
    • Company must be based in NYC.
    IAF
    • Technologies or intellectual property (IP) the company intends to commercialize must have
      unique and protectable aspects that establish a sustainable competitive advantage
    • Full and unencumbered legal right to the commercial use of the company?s technology or IP
    • The products and services the company intends to bring to market must meet a defined
      market need and have a significant and sustainable advantage over competitors
    • The addressable market should be at least $20 million and clearly defined
    • The management team must have the skills and domain expertise to be successful,
      or be willing to replace or augment the team as necessary
    • A clear path to commercialization and a plausible plan to support it
    • The company must be incorporated, or be incorporated by the time of IAF investment
    • Total revenues should be less than $500k from the time of incorporation
    • Intend for at least 50% of salaried employees to be based in Ontario

    There?s not a huge difference in the funding, or the requirements. But the NYC Seed option just feels cleaner. The IAF eligibility requirements are verbose and at times a little obvious. The big difference might be in the size of the fund, NYC Seed is just $2M where IAF is a $29M fund. And the differences in focus, NYC Seed is focused strongly on ?software and web-oriented technologies?, the IAF fund is part of the Centre of Excellence for Communications and Information Technology covering diverse areas as wireless and wireline communications, the Internet, human-computer interaction, health and medicine, software design, network planning, education, security, among others.

    NYC Seed aims to provide ?entrepreneurs support via a network of "notable entrepreneurs, technologists and venture capitalists?. Very similar to the Business Mentorship and Entrepreneurship Program provided by MaRS.

    There?s a different feel in the web copy used to describe each program. The IAF program just feels more cumbersome. However, it offers many of the same advantages for Ontario companies.We need to do some work to help local entrepreneurs understand the availability, benefits and people at OCE to connect with John MacRitchie, Bryan Kanarens and Charles Plant.

    I think all entrepreneurs looking to raise funding should be able to answer the questions on the NYC Seed application form. My offer, any Ontario-based entrepreneur that wants a connection to OCE, just send me an email with the information from the NYC Seed application (see below) and I will forward it to John MacRitchie.

    1. What?s the idea?
    2. Why now?
    3. Who are your competitors?
    4. How will you make money?
    5. How will you use the funding?
    6. Please describe your product development roadmap. How long will it take to complete your first version?
    7. Please provide bios for each founder.
    8. Please provide 3 references for each founder.
  • StartupCamp Toronto 2 – What we expect from you

    Pitching is never easy, and every pitch is different, but there are a few basic pieces of information that every audience would like to hear, so I decided to throw together an outline of the critical components that your pitch should cover.

    This is not an outline of your entire pitch, but a starting point to help you make sure that you have the most important parts in there.

    This is based on the audience feedback from StartupCampToronto 1.

    Market Analysis

    The audience needs to have some context. The easiest way to answer the majority of the audience?s questions is to define as tightly as possible who you plan to sell to.

    Relevant data includes

    • Estimated Market Size
    • Rough demographic information
    • Geographic limitations or focus
    • An idea of how your market will grow and change during the time you are targeting them

    Marketing Plan

    How will you communicate with your customers? ?We will get written about in blogs? is a popular but ultimately bad answer.

    If you have done the ?Market Analysis? work and have an idea of who you will be selling to, then the best way to get a decent first marketing plan is to look at the ways in which you can communicate with that market.

    Sales

    Not everyone will need this, but if your customers go through any sort of ?purchasing process? (ie: Enterprise customers, or small businesses), then it is a good idea to demonstrate how you will handle that sales process. What are your points of contact?

    How will you find a lead, test it and then follow through on communicating with them? Think about showing how you go from cold leads to getting the sales rolling in.

    Product Development Vision

    A lot of startups get so caught up in demoing what they have built so far that they forget to get people excited about what?s coming next. Telling people your vision for the product says a lot, but more than anything it shows that you aren?t going to sit still. People have trouble getting excited about a startup that has built something great but might not do much of interest going forward.

    • How will your product change?
    • How will the market change?
    • How will the product address that change?

    Don?t be that guy

    Occasionally there is a really smart group of people who have the product nailed, but are weak on the marketing and biz dev side of the startup. If you fit that profile, the audience is going to be hard on you about this, so you have to prepare to be as open as possible to the advice you will get.

    What you don?t want to do is to become defensive and start relying on the product as your savior in each case ?it will sell itself?, etc.

    Don?t be ?that guy? who won?t admit his shortcomings. Knowing your weaknesses is a critical part of being a great entrepreneur. So get real about where you fall down and get ready to be grilled about it.

    Relax

    Relax. Startupcamp could be the opportunity of a lifetime for your startup. Mentors, investors and other entrepreneurs (who may be your most valuable connection) are all there to help you build something great. So relax, you are among friends.

    Our Sponsors

  • The Do's and Don'ts of Raising Capital

    The Wellington Financial Blog is probably one of the most underrated in Canada. Not only are these guys the real-deal, but they have some serious guts and don’t pull punches for anyone.

    Yesterday they published a great but simple list: The Do’s and Don’ts of Raising Capital. The blog is not startup focused specifically, you can think of it as a Bay Street version of StartupNorth, but the topics are worth reading about when you have time. They also have the occasional scoop on Bay Street gossip, like today’s (or should I say, yesterday’s, or last month’s) CIBC news.

    Do?s:

    1. When you ask to meet with an prospective investor, have a defined amount or money in mind, or at least a range, and know what the use of proceeds will be.

    2. Prepare an overview, and there?s nothing wrong with PowerPoint. The pitch can be 15-25 slides long. No one needs a 50 page deck for the first meeting; there?s no way you?ll get through it all during the first session in any event (see below).

    3. Ask for 60 minutes, and no more. That should be all that you need for the 1st meeting.

    4. Show up on time.

    5. If you are bringing your own laptop, make sure you know what you plan to do with it during the meeting: run the show on a wall, link in to an overhead projector, etc.

    6. If you feel you need a non-disclosure agreement executed prior to the meeting, don?t be surprised that the prospective investor might want you to sign their own – rather than yours. If you see 100 or more companies a year, you can imagine how hard it would be for the investor to execute 100 different NDAs.

    7. Review the website of the investor prior to the meeting. If you don?t know what type of firm it is (equity vs. debt vs. LSIF vs. agent vs. principal), you might be wasting your time – and theirs.

    8. If you are going to engage an agent, make sure you know what role you want them to play. Some deals benefit from an outside advisor, and some may not. As much as VCs don?t like to think that entrepreneurs feel the need to spend part of the raise on fees, one wouldn?t do a deal with lawyers or accountants. But if you get an agent involved (and sometimes that agent/advisor can also be a lawyer or an accountant if they have the specific expertise), use them for the hard stuff, like telling you what is practical on the key negotiating items, what?s ?market?, and so forth.

    9. If you get a term sheet and are trying to compare one investor?s proposal to another, make sure you ask about prior deal references. The price/terms of a deal are only part of the decision-making process, or at least they shouldn?t be the sole criteria. Ask to speak to a couple of prior investee companies, and ask how many deals have closed in the past year or two. Do at least some due diligence on the group you are talking to, as not all teams/funds are the same – by a long shot.

    Don?ts:

    1. Don?t send a 10 page NDA to a firm. This is the deal: we investors promise to not steal your idea or tell a competitor about it. We promise to keep your private data private. We promise not to poach staff we meet during the process. That shouldn?t take 10 pages to document.

    2. Don?t ask for a meeting, pitch your story, and show a forecast that ?isn?t board approved?. If you aren?t yet ready to raise capital, why ask for the meeting?

    3. Don?t go into a pitch without knowing ?where your existing investors live?. That?s code for: know whether or not the current investors will play on the upcoming round or not.

    4. Don?t send a PDF of your financial model. It?ll only make the investor wonder why you don?t want to share the working excel version.

    5. If you are raising anything post an Angel round, don?t ask for a meeting if you don?t have a financial model ready. Having a pitch meeting and then sending a model a couple of weeks later ensures that 1) the iron may now no longer be hot, 2) the VC might have come to an uneducated, yet quick, no, or 3) you?ll seem disorganized, which may be normal for early stage companies but not a confidence-builder.

    6. Don?t compare yourself to Google, as in: ?What we?re doing is more robust than Google?, ?What we?re doing is harder than Google?, or ?We are going to be the next Google?.

    7. Don?t bring five or six company people to the first meeting. There are rarely enough chairs anyway, and don?t some of these people have jobs that don?t involve raising capital?

    8. Don?t say you?ll send follow-up material ?in a couple of days?, and then go silent for several weeks. If you ask for a meeting to raise capital, and the prospective investor is interested, be conscious that they see 500 or more ideas a year and can?t possibly waste five minutes let alone a couple of hours.

    9. When you do send forecasts, don?t send a budget that shows revenue going from, say, $1 million this year to $100 million in three years? time. People will think – fair or not – that you?ve lost your mind.

    10. When talking future valuation, don?t use numbers that involve ?billions?. As in, ?We?ll be worth north of a billion by 2012?. People will think – fair or not – that you?re on crack.

    11. Don?t be offended if the investor turns you down, as long as they are polite about it.

  • Cover Your …

    Let’s face it, most entrepreneurs break all kinds of rules (the law is no exception). Starting a business is risky and time consuming; when your immediate survival is determined by your burn rate, the quality of your product, and time to market, it is easy to overlook or even knowingly ignore legal niceties.

    The thing of it is… investors want something tangible to hold onto. You won’t get very far with “we’re buddies so it is 50/50” or “we’ll figure out who owns what later”. Partners will also grow anxious without some formality and structure. Adhering to a few best practices may very well determine the near (and long) term prospects of your endeavor.

    Next Tuesday (November 13) from 12:00 – 1:00 PM EST, Cognition LLP‘s Joe Milstone will be hosting a free webinar on legal issues startups can?t ignore but often do. Well worth your time to listen in and listen up.

    What legal issues have you knowingly ignored in your startup? Post your (anonymous) responses in the comments.

  • Amazon Web Services – Learn to Scale

    What are you going to do to scale when the time comes? Are you planning for it now? Does it involve Amazon EC2, S3, flexible payment or another Amazon service?

    If you are curious and in Toronto, try to get out to the upcoming AmazonCamp (date, time and place all TBD — bit it will be soon) that Ryan Coleman is organizing.

    Services like Amazon’s Web Services are going to be critical for startups who need to grow. It is just too expensive to manage all of your own hardware and if you are the flavor of the day, or if your customers have short bursts of demand, you are going to need to scale up as quickly as you will then need to scale back down. Every startup should at least asses the savings they might get from using on-demand storage and computing.

    Check out bootstrapping with AWS to avoid VC over on slideshare.